The answer is most likely C, can a robot dominated government run a human society. The assumption here is that robots already have dominated human kind. Because of their machine intelligence, they don't feel like humans do and therefore persecute those who are against the government. This shows a dystopian universe.
Answer:
informed consent
Explanation:
According to my research on experiment legal procedures, I can say that based on the information provided within the question all studies involving human subjects must include informed consent. This term is defined as permission granted in full knowledge of the possible consequences. If a researcher does not have this, then the researcher cannot legally use the subject for his studies, since in the eyes of the law it may be considered torture or kidnapping since you do not have proof of the subjects consent.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Dear Mrs./Ms./Mr. ...
My name is ... and the reason I'm reaching out to you is my belief that people should know about a certain person named ... She lives in a village in India and has recently become a hero for some and an outcast for others.
..., as many other girls in her country, was brought up in a traditional family whose values were taught her, but certainly not accepted without questioning and resistance. She has, even though with little support at first, decided to fight an ancient system she believes to be most unfair.
She has refused to get married in an attempt to protest against the dowry system. She belives it to be a tradition worth letting go of, one that keeps women where they do not belong: below, as someone who not only has the obligation of getting married, but the obligation of paying for it.
... has suffered a great deal and had it not been for some good friends and social media, she might not have had any of the acknowledgment she has now gained.
I believe, however, that more can be done for her through your newspaper. If her story were to be shared and known this way, it might open the doors for her to become an official speaker on behalf of all the women who live under the same circumstances.
I truly hope you'll take my request into consideration. For further information about her, you may contact me at...
Sincerely,
...
Answer:
To bring a person from history to life.
Explanation:
In the given excerpt from "We Shall Not Be Moved", the author describes Esther Lobetkin, leader of the strikers and chairman of the<em> "Yiddish-speaking group"</em>. This description allows the readers to get an insight into what she was like.
And by explicitly naming Esther and giving details about her character, work ethic, and the busy schedule she lived, the author allows us to get a sense of what this historical person must be like. This also makes us be familiar and come to understand the person Esther was.
Thus, the <u>correct answer is that this naming and describing of Esther Lobetkin is to bring a historical person to life.</u>
