Answer:
It can be lays or lies. But I'm going with the guy on the bottom.
Explanation:
See what I did there?
:|
:)
:D
~<em>Jack Pullman </em>
<em>p.s. mark for brainliest, please!</em>
Detail at the end of Nectar in a Sieve that suggests that hope endures in the face of tragedy is a.) Rukmani adopts an orphan boy and brings him to the village.
Rukmani, to facilitate her sadness over losing Nathan swings to Puli. Rukmani promises for Puli's well being if with her he returns to the town. Selvan and Ira are introduced to Puli as the son that Nathan and she adopted. This demonstrates compassion and hopes while Selvam promises to manage everything and Ira prepares the meal for Puli.
The writer of "The Instinct that Makes People Rich" interprets the Midas myth as the story of a man who could not fail.
Chesterton, however, says that Midas DID fail. He starved because he could not eat gold.
Chesterton says that success always comes at the sacrifice of something else, something "domestic." (By this he means that, yes, a millionaire has money but will lack something else, like love or friendship, etc.) He says that people who think Midas succeeded are just like the author of the article -- both worship money.
Chesterton says that worshipping money has nothing to do with success and everything to do with snobbery.
Answer:
B. Populous
Explanation:
The best option that completes this sentence is the word 'populous'.
<em>Did you know Hong Kong is one of the world's most </em><u><em>populous</em></u><em> cities?</em>
To complete this sentence we needed a word that modifies the noun 'cities', so we needed an adjective.
Option A is wrong because it is misspelled.
Option C is wrong because it is a noun. To put two nouns together doesn't make any sense to the information of the sentence.
Option B is correct.
<u>Populous (adjective)</u> - full of residents or inhabitants, as a region; heavily populated. This word is completely suitable for our sentence as it finishes its complete thought.
I hope it helped you :)
