<span>A quasi-experimental study
This allows examination of the two cases although the base for each is the same.</span>
<u>Answer:
</u>
The model that involves such recognition is referred to as the 'ideal model' of undue influence.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The ideal model of undue influence refers to the cases of financial remuneration where the influence creates an ignorance towards the differences existent in the remuneration of employees working at the same level.
- The inverse of this model is also true and is again considered to be a part of undue influence. But in that case, the nature of work allocated to the employees is different in true sense.
In this situation the correct answer is A. justices debate the importance of different cases since debate has to come before the official vote of the Justices.
Answer:
Sara overhead a private conversation that she was not supposed to hear. Sara should keep what she heard to herself so that rumors don't get spread around.
I don’t understand bro what