Hello!
In linguistics, we recognise 4 types of arguments, and two of them are experience, and examples; therefore, in this case, correct answer is: The Narrators growth can contrast naive views with the harsh realities of war.
Hope this helps
Each School type has it's own unique benefits and challenges;
If you are interested in college schools you can consider these categories:
- Dream schools: which are colleges where your academic credentials fall in the lower end or below.
- Target schools: where your academic credentials fall within the school's average range for the recently class that is accepted.
- Safety schools: where your academic credentials exceed the range for any average first-year student.
Or if you're about Secondary, High School or so, they can be classified in 2 major types:
- Public Schools: which are universal (available to everyone) and they are funded and controlled by the government.
- Private Schools: which are not funded or operated by federal, state or local governments.
Among Public Schools we can include:
Magnet schools, Charter Schools, Urban Schools, Rural Schools
and High Needs Schools.
And among Private Schools we can include
Military schools and Boarding schools.
<span>D is the correct answer. Slogan D is most effective because not only does it give important information (the date of the fair), which none of the other slogans give, it uses an imperative verb “come” which is important in influencing people to take action.</span>
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
In terms of structure, the poems are very different. The haiku is only three lines long and discusses a single moment in time; “Digging” is much longer, has many stanzas, and jumps between time periods. There are some ways in which the poems are similar, however. For example, the speakers of both poems discuss how their writing is related to and inspired by farming or gardening.
