Answer:
The problem is that it stimulates the underutilization of the brain and the waste of all its potential.
Explanation:
Nicholas Carr states in his text that memory is something built that must be stimulated and trained in order to be efficient. This causes our brain to develop and use all the potential that we know it has. With memorization, we are able to learn about everything, but memorization is decaying, since we are relying on memory devices that are becoming increasingly popular with the advancement of technology and that are extremely stimulated and defended by the people who make them. the intense use of the internet.
Neils will admire Gerda as she admires him.
Explanation:
Neils was a horse and a man, made into a single mold. He was a charming young man who attracted even the ladies older than him. He was deceived by Mrs. Boye and later he met a young girl named Gerda.
Gerda was young and she died soon after their marriage. Her love changed from her husband to her Christmas God. Neils felt betrayed of love.
Even when he was wounded in the war and died, he did not bend to religion.
If you're talking about the poem by Edith M. Thomas then I believe that the central idea is about how people can base something off of their looks. I'm not completely sure, but it talks a lot about how they look dead, but then explain that they are not. To me that makes it sound a lot like the saying "don't judge a book by its cover".
It could also mean that things take time to grow into something beautiful, and before that happens, you have to go through something difficult, seeming as if it is the end of the world. But then you blossom and bloom and everybody will look in awe.
I'm not completely sure these are right, and I'm not sure we read the same poem, but you didn't state the author's name. This was just off the top of my head but I hope it helps you or gives you an idea :)
Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
since a professor has already written books on the production of food he should be well prepared for writing an article. People who already write have a better ability to grab a reader's attention.
the tv reporter has only visited a single fast food museum, so he wouldn't have much to write on.
the former worker is already mad at being fired (he would write negatively about the place) and only has knowledge about meat. (in my opinion)
the senator could be a good option but his field is law not writing.
hope this helps :-)
