All categories

2 years ago

What is true about Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Business

1 answer:

11111nata11111 [884]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

C) The act applies to organizations with 15 or more employees

Explanation:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating employees or applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, gender, national origin or religion. This law applies to organizations with 15 or more employees, including all government entities.

You might be interested in

This activity is important because as a manager, you should know how compensation methods are related to motivation theories. Co

kompoz [17]

Answer:

A. Merit Pay - 2. Equity Theory

B. Gain sharing 3. Goal-setting Theory: Unit-Focused

C. Piece-Rate Systems 4. Goal-setting Theory: Individual-Focused

D. Recognition Awards 1. Expectancy Theory Instrumentality

E. Lump-Sum Bonuses 5. Extrinsic Motivation

Explanation:

Employee motivation is dependent on many factors. A person may be motivated just if his work is appreciated. He feels that his work is appreciated and for this reason he is motivated to perform better. Some people consider pay rise or monetary rewards as their motivation factor. Some people finds more authority as their motivating factor. They feel motivated if they are given more challenging work and more authority.

8 0

2 years ago

A flood damaged several vans belonging to a nongovernmental, not-for-profit organization. A professional mechanic repaired the v

Westkost [7]

Answer:

b. As both an increase in the equipment account and an increase in contributions from donated services.

Explanation:

When the flood damages the vehicles there was a loss in the value of the organisation's equipment. The actor of restoring it to its previous state will require an addition to equipment account. So there will be an increase in equipment.

The services provided by the mechanic were free and will be recorded as a donated service. This is an increase in contributions from donated services.

There is no expense recorded as the services were performed for free.

5 0

2 years ago

During 2019, Ocean Consulting had the following transactions with it clients (customers): On February 1, 2019, the company recei

vova2212 [387]

Answer:

$20,000

Explanation:

According to the given situation, the computation of stockholder equity is shown below:-

Stockholder equity = Service in cash + Sent bills

= $15,500 + $4,500

= $20,000

Therefore for computing the stockholder equity we simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

Hence, the stockholder equity is $20,000

6 0

2 years ago

Project A has cash flows of –$74,900, $18,400, $26,300, and $57,100 for Years 0 to 3, respectively. Project B has cash flows of

Marrrta [24]

Answer:

Project A should be accepted NPV 3,948.77

Project B should be rejected NPV -7.086,76

Explanation:

We will calculate the present value of each cash flow at the discount rate of 11.5% using the formula for present value of a lump sum:

$\frac{Nominal}{(1 + rate)^{time} } = PV$

rate for each cashflow will be 11.5%

time will be the year of the cashflow

and the nominal each cash flow

<u>Project B:</u>

Year 1

$\frac{18400}{(1 + 0.115)^{1} } = PV$

PV 16,502.24

Year 2

$\frac{22700}{(1 + 0.115)^{2} } = PV$

PV 18,258.96

Year 3

$\frac{51500}{(1 + 0.115)^{3} } = PV$

PV 37,152.04

Total discounted cashflow: 71,913.24‬

NPV: discounted cashflow - investment

71,913.24 - 79,000 = -7.086,76

Project B should be rejected NPV -7.086,76

Project A:

Year 1:

$\frac{18400}{(1 + 0.115)^{1} } = PV$

PV 16,502.24

Year 2:

$\frac{26300}{(1 + 0.115)^{2} } = PV$

PV 21,154.66

Year 3:

$\frac{57100}{(1 + 0.115)^{3} } = PV$

PV 41,191.87

Total discounted cashflow: 78.848,77

NPV:discounted cashflow - investment

78,848.77 - 74,900 = 3,948.77‬

Project A should be accepted NPV 3,948.77

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is true for American options? A. Put-call parity provides an upper and a lower bound for the difference b

velikii [3]

The statement that holds true for the American Option is (A) Put-call parity provides an upper and lower bound for the difference between call and put prices

Explanation:

According to the Put-call parity concept when we hold the short European put and long European call of similar class the return delivered is same as holding one forward contract of the same underlying asset, that has the same expiration, forward price and which is equal to the strike price of the option

In financial management put–call parity concept is used to define the relationship that exist between the price of a European call option and European put option, and both of them have identical strike price and expiry

The formula used for calculating put call parity is

c + k = f +p

where (c) call price plus the (k) strike price of both options is equal to the futures price(f) plus the put price(p)

4 0

2 years ago