Answer:
Neto's conflict about playing football for racist fans is developed through
complications. First, he encourages all of the players to quit the team, but most of
the players decide to keep playing. Then, the school officials refuse to help. These
events reach a climax when Allison reads a letter against racism at the next football
game. The resolution is that the fans change their behavior. Now, Neto knows that
some things are more important than football and that he can make a difference in his
community.
<span>
C. have the ability to teach the job you will be doing. </span>
First and foremost, supervisors have the ability to teach the
job you will be doing. This is so
because, in order for a supervisor to provide good supervision in regard to
determine whether those being supervised are performing well their jobs,
supervisors will need to know how to perform the job themselves. As such, because the will have most likely
done the job well themselves in order to achieve a supervisory position, they
would certainly have the ability to teach it to you.
B. The relationship between the average numbers of large zebra mussels and blue crabs over time
Answer:
The people of Nnaemeka’s village arrange the marriages of most couples.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) Potential Sources of confounding:
1) Pancreatic cancer patients were being compared with persons hospitalized for cancerous diseases. Coffee may likely aggravate the pains of pancreatic cancer patients unlike other cancer patients because the latter's cancer diseases were not digestive.
2) Unintended bias was introduced by investigators in questioning patients. The investigators asked questions on coffee drinking habits of those already hospitalized. This biased the drinking of coffee as a predisposing factor.
3) There could be differences among men and women because of other habits. While drinking more coffee predisposed women to cancer, according to the confounding statements, drinking even more did not have much difference in men.
Explanation:
"CRITICS SAY COFFEE STUDY WAS FLAWED" was an article in New York Times written by Harold M. Schmeck Jr. on June 30, 1981. It attempted to critique the study of drinking coffee and its disposal to cause cancer to the drinkers.
In this article, he introduced the views of critics of the Coffee Study which was earlier published in the New England Journal of Medicine and the accompanying refutal by the researchers.