Answer:
The correct answer is D.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Annual contribution margin of $80,000 and $160,000 in annual fixed
costs.
Of the fixed costs, $50,000 cannot be avoided.
<u>To calculate the financial impact on income, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Effect on income= avoidable fixed costs - contribution margin
Effect on income= 50,000 - 80,000
Effect on income= -$30,000
Answer:
Business Solutions
Second-quarter 2018
Fixed Budget Performance Report
Budgeted Actual
Variable expenses for desks $104,720 $104,720*
Variable expenses for chairs, $20,800 $20,800*
<u>Fixed expenses $34,000 $35,800</u>
<u>Total Expenses $159,520 $ 156,320 </u>
*Suppose the actual variable expenses are the same as budgeted variable expenses.
Explanation:
The variable expenses depend on the number of units of chairs and desks produced where as the fixed expenses remain constant irrespective of the no of units of production.
Variable expenses are those expenses that vary directly with the number of units produced ( example more desks and more chairs will require more material).
Answer:
The principle of the Software Engineering Code of Ethics that Morris has violated is:
the Product principle.
Explanation:
The Product principle requires that Morris' program (product and related modifications) should meet the highest professional standards. Staying within budget and rationalizing an error as minor are not requirements of the Software Engineering Code of Ethics that Morris subscribed to.
Other requirements of the code include acting in the best interest of the public, client, and employer; maintaining high product standards; integrity and independence in professional judgment; using an ethical approach; maintaining professional integrity and independence; being fair and supportive to colleagues; and ensuring participation in lifelong learning.
Answer:
Jaxon Furnishings Company Vs Logging Opportunities in Alaska
Comparison of the benefits of increased wood production to the costs of deforestation:
The company is using the __environmental sustainability___ approach to make this ethical decision.
Explanation:
According to brittanica.com, environmental "sustainability is understood as a form of intergenerational ethics in which the environmental and economic actions taken by present persons do not diminish the opportunities of future persons to enjoy similar levels of wealth, utility, or welfare."
An approach to an ethical decision is sustainable when it considers the long-term benefits and costs associated with the decision, instead of concentrating on the short-term benefits as some business transactions are done. Short-termism selfishly considers the immediate gains from a transaction. It lacks a futuristic appetite for the good of future generations.
Answer:
-11.8%
Explanation:
the key to answer this question is to remember that valuation of a bond depends basically of calculating the present value of a series of cash flows, so let´s think about a bond as if you were a lender so you will get interest by the money you lend (coupon) and at the end of n years you will get back the money you lend at the beginnin (principal), so applying math we have the bond value given by:
so in this particular case that one year later there are 29 years to maturity so we have:
so as we have a higher rate the investment has the next return:
