All categories

2 years ago

Why did more Northerners than Southerners know how to read and write?

History

2 answers:

ladessa [460]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

hope this helps! :) :) :) have a nice day

lianna [129]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

B. Northern cities established free public schools.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

"a great democracy has got to be progressive or it will soon cease to be great or a democracy." Can u explain the meaning of thi

den301095 [7]

a great democracy has got to be progressive or it will soon cease to be great or a democracy.

Ideally, the foundations of democracy should be derived from the people. The people--as a collective entity--is always changing. That's in a general sense. America as a full fledged democracy is arguable just because we elect representatives to choose further up the food chain. On the other hand, that can be considered democracy in play in itself.

An example of progress in democracy, formerly marginalized people would add into the collective people.

The more input, the greater the people beneifited, the more impact, the greater the society.

5 0

2 years ago

Why does Joshua Drake allow his children to work in textile factories? List at least two pieces of evidence. Your answer should

Amanda [17]

I have attached a document I found that details the questioning of Joshua Drake. I based my answer from this document.

Joshua Drake allows his children to work in the textile factories because of NECESSITY.

Joshua Drake only works for 2 days. He has other means of income but these are not permanent nor are they enough to subsidize the needs of the family.

Everyone in the family needs to work in order for them to satisfy their most basic needs. That is why his children also work because what they earn goes to the family coffers.

For Joshua Drake, it is preferable to work limited hours and earn lower wages compared to working longer hours but is not regularly employed.

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which sequence of events shows how Mesopotamia developed?

Sladkaya [172]

The answer is most likely D

Explanation:

I used my best judgement to answer this as well as process of elimination, I immediately eliminated b and c. then it was between a and d for answers. I thought D made the most sense from what I know about ancient civilizations, and prehistoric history.

7 0

2 years ago

What is the difference between a solstice and an equinox ?Using three or more complete sentences, describe the reasons why these

mrs_skeptik [129]

The biggest difference between a equinox and solstice is that a solstice is the point during the earths orbit around the sun at which the sun is at its greatest distance from the equator, while during an equinox, it’s at the closest distance from the equator. I’m a solstice the summers are longer, in equinox only happen 2 times a year when the earths axis is tilted.

9 0

2 years ago

what are the chief steps leading to the definition of history given in the paragraph beginning “This line of reasoning...” Why n

MAVERICK [17]

A definition of history in a dictionary would say something along the lines of:

History:

1. The branch of knowledge dealing with past events.

2. A continuous, systematic telling of past events.

<em>(Wordreference) </em>

If, when defining history, we were to only look up a definition in a dictionary, we would have a simplistic view of what this branch of study does. History is definitely concerned with telling past events. However, this information is often incomplete, contradictory, too abundant, too unclear or inexistent. Even when information is readily available, the source of information can never be perfect because of problems that are inherent in recording events, such as perspective, or bias.

The task of historians, then, is to try to be as precise as possible without adding information they cannot be sure about. They also have to draw their own conclusions when there is not enough definite evidence. This is what the paragraph refers to as an argument, because of the interplay of evidence and conclusion.

Therefore, because of all the inherent problems in interpretation, the thing that historians can control the most is the method, or the “way of reading and writing about events of the past.” If, during interpretation, historians make use of a systematic, professional set of rules to interpret, they can be more confident in their conclusions. This set of rules is what people have to master if they desire to become historians.

3 0

2 years ago