1m = 100cm
1cm → 0.5m
1cm → 0.5 · 100cm = 50cm
The scale: 
length = 26.8cm · 50 = 1,340cm = 13.40m
width = 12.2cm · 50 = 610cm = 6.10m
The area of the court:
A = 13.40 · 6.10 = 81.74 m²
<span>triangle CDN ≅ triangle CBM
</span><span>
Statement | Reason
line DC ≅ __BC___ | The sides of a square are congruent.
line BM ≅ __DN___ | They are both half the length of a side of the square.
angle __D___ ≅ angle B | All the angles of a square are congruent.
triangle CDN ≅ CBM |
by
</span><span>SAS</span>
Let us see... ideally we would like to have all equations with the same exponent or the same base so that we can compare the rates. Since the unknown is in the exponent, we have to work with them. In general,
![x^(y/z)= \sqrt[z]{x^y}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%5E%28y%2Fz%29%3D%20%5Csqrt%5Bz%5D%7Bx%5Ey%7D%20)
.
Applying this to the exponential parts of the functions, we have that the first equation is equal to:
250*(
![\sqrt[5]{1.45} ^t](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csqrt%5B5%5D%7B1.45%7D%20%5Et)
)=250*(1.077)^t
The second equation is equal to: 200* (1.064)^t in a similar way.
We have that the base of the first equation is higher, thus the rate of growth is faster in the first case; Choice B is correct.
Angles RLN and MLK would be vertical angles.
Right. Vertical angles are formed when their
sides share the same lines. RL shares the same line with LM and NL shares the
same line with LK (see the attached diagram), so that means both angles form a vertical
pair.
Angles RLN and MLN would be vertical angles.
Wrong. They are linear pairs, because they
are adjacent and supplementary. Adjacent angles share a side – in this case,
LN. Supplementary angles sum 180°, which you can see is right because the other
sides (ML and RL) are in the same line. RLN and MLN sum the same as the size of
RLM, which is a line, so it’s 180°.
<span>
Angles RLN and KLM would be a linear pair. </span>
Wrong. They would be a vertical pair (see
definition of vertical pair in the first option). RL is opposed to LM and LN is
opposed to KL.
Angles RLN and KLN would be a linear pair.
Wrong. KLN is actually a line, so it’s actually
180°, so it can’t be a linear pair with KLN. Linear pairs sum 180°, which is
impossible because KLN itself is already 180°, so any sum will throw a higher
number.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
600 X .50 = 300.00 1st month
600 X .05 = 30.00 47 months
30 X 47 = 1,410
1,410 + 300 = 1,710 (final answer)