<span>A major difference between juvenile and adult courts is that juvenile courts are more likely to consider extenuating circumstances (emotional, mental, situational, etc.). Frequently, young people will only be moved to adult courts if their crime was particularly heinous, a history of rehabilitation services have not improved the situation, the young person needs a significant about of intervention, or simply that the juvenile is nearly an adult. Though there is evidence of some past intervention on Gwendolyn's behalf, we have no evidence that the crime was planned. Though she was breaking the law and one could say that the possibility of an accident was a logical conclusion, there is (based on this) no evidence that she went out with the intention of hurting or killing someone. Also, given that she is still a minor and at an age when her reasoning abilities are not fully formed, she honestly may not have been able to make that connection.
So, no, she should not be tried as an adult. However, she should serve actual time in a center, receiving rehabilitative services and completing community service in order to balance out some of the horror she has brought into the world through the death of a child.</span>
Answer:
A. Assuming that employees would understand the content of the PowerPoint slides
Explanation:
One of the most common mistakes that can be made is assuming that the receiver on the other end of the communication chain would understand quite well, what message, you as the sender, is passing across.
In the scenario cited in the question above, the new benefit offerings that have been developed after the overhauling, of which Mike has taken his time to explain in a power point presentation just few months before employees would be required to enroll for the program, must have been misunderstand by the employees. The multiple emails reveals that the employees do not really understand the content, and this comes as a surprised to Mike. We can infer that Mike must have made the mistake of assuming that the employees would understand the content of the PowerPoint slides.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The computation of Kiyara’s deduction for qualified business income is shown below:-
Kiyara's Share of income is
= 50% × $332,000
= $166,000
Max qualified business deduction is
= 20% × $166,000
= $33,200
b. The computation of Kiyara’s net investment income tax liability is shown below:-
Net investment income tax liability = $166,000 × 3.8%
= $6,308
c. The computation of Kiyara’s self-employment tax liability is shown below:-
Kiyara is not earning Jazz Corp.'s self-employment taxable income because Kiyara is not doing work for Jazz Corp.
Hence, the tax liability for self-employment is 0.
d. The computation of Kiyara’s additional Medicare tax liability is shown below:-
Additional medicare tax liability
= $282,000 - $200,000
= $82,000 × 0.9%
= $738
Answer:
The correct answer is option 4.
Explanation:
Rhonda has agreed to invest $16,000 in a partnership with her sister and brother-in-law. she does not plan to work in partnership or invest any of her wealth other than $16,00. But she intends on sharing profits. This implies that Rhonda is a limited partner in the business.
A limited partner is a partial owner of a business. His/her liability to the business's debts is limited to the extent of the amount he/she has invested in the business. Such partners are often called silent partners as they don't have any involvement in the day to day operations.
Answer:
The correct option is A
Explanation:
Capitalization is the term or the process in which there is an addition of the interest which is unpaid to the principal amount of the loan. And the principal or the original amount of the loan increases or rises when the payments got postponed during the deferment periods and then the interest which is unpaid is capitalized.
So, it will be capitalized whether or not there is particular or the specific amount of borrowing for the construction.
