Answer:
Google
Explanation:
thanks I do it for the points
Q:
What evidence from the folklore will prove the customs of the people living in the land of mindanao?
A: My experiences outlined below are intended to be a background for the discussion of the theory and practice of Philippine oral traditions that follows. I have been engaged in folklore activities for the past few decades. I was born and grew up in a central Luzon town whose population was about half Ilocano and half Tagalog. I had before me, therefore, a wealth of customs and practices which a mixed constituency offered for study, especially those related to marriage and burial, types of houses and wells, gardens in the field, and so on. However, I was then still too young to pay any attention to their meaning. My father was a well-known storyteller and anecdotalist but by the time scholars had taken an interest in these tales, I myself had long forgotten almost all of them. My interest in folklore study was first stimulated by the folklore course I took with Prof. H. Otley Beyer. He instructed his students to gather myths, legends, folktales, folksongs, games, tiddles and proverbs which were current in their birthplaces and hometowns but he said nothing to us about methodology. Later, I also took a course in world literature taught by Prof. Dean S. Fansler, who asked us to submit term papers on any aspect of ethnic literature, whether oral or written. I decided on submitting one on oral literature — Tayabas Tagalog songs. Both Beyer and Fansler hardly touched methodology. Fansler, however, paved the way for the historical interpretation of tales in his magnum opus, Filipino Popular Tales (1921). In this manner Fansler became an outstanding folklorist but Beyer remained the big-time collector. I became Beyer's helper in the tremendous job of gathering his materials. A third influence on my career was Prof. Gabriel A. Bernardo, then the librarian of the University of the Philippines Library, which I had joined in 1929, Bernardo regaled me with his ribald tales about friars, which he told in the manner of Boccancio and Chaucer. We also had long conversations on paleography and metrical romances, which added to my store of knowledge in the field.
I think the answer is D. Hope this Helps.
The correct answer is redress.
Redressing is a process in which an individual tries to get the ruling of a previous court case changed. This process involves a system of appeals, with the Supreme Court being the highest court of appeals in the country. Any ruling that results from a Supreme Court trumps any state law currently in place. This is because the Supreme Court is the most powerful court in the United States of America.
If Mr. Smith won his case, it would set a new precedent (example) in the United States.
According to the evolution of the Catholic Church in Russia, several events took place that gave birth to Christianity in Russia:
Princess Olga converted to Roman Catholicism. Princess Olga was the first ruler in Rus to convert to Christianity in 945. She was baptized and made several efforts to spread Christianity in Russia.
The pope sent a cardinal and several monks to Kiev. Pope John XV and Sylvester II sent different embassies to Kiev in order to spread Christianity but most of them were killed or died in prison.
Prince Vladimir arranged mass baptisms in Kiev. Princess Olga’s grandson Price Vladimir followed her conversion to Christianity and was baptized. Then he exhorted the people of Kiev to be baptized in the Dnieper River. A mass baptism of the people of Kiev took place and this event marked the beginning of Christianity in Kiev.
