If there’s supposed to be an attachment there isn’t, but this question out of context is quite simple.
Agreement is a mixture of both parties stating their needs and wants, and through discussion and compromise. It’s finding a common ground where both parties are happy and satisfied with the outcome.
After reading the passage about Ogilvy, I realized how curios he was that he wanted to see the thing clearly.
From the choices given (if this question has the same choices with the ones posted here before), the answer would be: <span>Ogilvy’s curiosity tends to overcome his better judgment.</span>
It’s D I know because I have the same answer
On my test
The answer I believe is B. Hope all goes well!:)
If the options are:
A. Viewers would have to infer the emotions and motivations of Ben and Regina.
B. Viewers would have to envision the physical descriptions of Ben and Regina.
C. Viewers would have to imagine the few props being used by Ben and Regina.
<span>D. Viewers would have to visualize the actions and movements of Ben and Regina.
</span>
Then the right answer is A. In stage and film adaptations, there is no need for the viewers to envision physical descriptions, imagine props, or visualize actions and movements. They can already see all of that, as the directors have already taken care of it. We only have to visualize all these things when we read the play. However, inferring the inner enigmas of characters' motivations is still up to us.
