Paul robeson believed whites would see african americans as equals if whites understood african american: CultureOf course there will always be a different between each cultures. But, if we understand another culture, we could understand why that person behave the way they do, which makes it easier for us to treat them as equal
Answer: the correct answer is (c) a fallacious argument masquerading as valid.
Explanation:
Fallacious Argument.- An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid. It is crucial to remember that reasoning from definitions and facts to conclusions is fundamentally different from reasoning about definitions.
Answer: The correct answer is: "As of January 2015, the NIH expects investigators to obtain the informed (valid) consent of research participants in NIH - funded genetic research for broad research use of data and data sharing, even if the cell lines or specimens are de-identified."
Explanation:
De-identification refers to the process of keep hidden someone's personal information. In general, people who participate in a research want their personal information (name, ID, address, phone number, date of birth) maintain anonymous. For that reason, the NIH expects investigators to obtain the informed (valid) consent of research participants even if they had decided to keep their samples as de-identified.
The correct answer is that David came second.
Julie is ahead of Roger.
<u /><u>Julie - Roger
</u>Julie is after James.
<u>James - Julie - Roger
</u>David is before James.
<u>David - James - Julie - Roger.
</u>David is after Sarah.
<u>Sarah - David - James - Julie - Roger
</u>This means that David is second.<u>
</u>
Answer:
fraud
Explanation:
In statute, theft is deliberate deceit in securing unjust or wrongful advantage, or in depriving a person of civil rights. Fraud may infringe common law, constitutional law, or it might not trigger income, properties, or legal damage, but it could also be an aspect of some civil and criminal error. Fraud can have as its intent financial gain or other advantages.
Thus, we can conclude that the given case illustrates fraud.