Answer:
a. intrinsic rewards
Explanation:
Intrinsic rewards at the workplace are those that meet personal, internal needs. These intrisic rewards can be summed up in job satisfaction and sense of accomplishment, but what makes a job satisfying, and what makes a worker feel accomplished is subjective, and varies from person to person.
Mike is focusing on the intrinsic rewards of his new job because he is giving more importance to this subjective aspects explained above than to external factors such as status, or wage.
Answer:
The correct answer is E
Explanation:
Servant leader is the kind of leadership which is defined as the philosophy as well as the set of the practices that enriches the individuals lives and builds the better firm and also establish the most caring world.
This leadership focus on offering the increased services to others. So, the characteristics involve the belief that they are stewards of their employees and the resources as well as commitment to the people growth.
Answer:
b. $150,000
Explanation:
The computation of the working capital is shown below:
= Total current assets - total current liabilities
= $370,000 - $220,000
= $150,000
We simply applied the above formula
And, the same is to be considered
Hence, the working capital is $150,000
Therefore the correct option is b. $150,000
All the other options are wrong.
Answer:
c. 12%; 15.7%
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
For expected rate of return:
= (Weightage of risky asset × return of risky asset) + (Weightage of treasury bill × return of treasury bill)
= (0.70 × 0.15) + (0.30 × 0.05)
= 10.5% + 1.5%
= 12%
For standard deviation:
= Weightage of risky asset × (variance ^ half)
= 0.70 × (0.05 ^ 0.5)
= 15.7%
Answer:
A) change in the cost of eating index = <u>20% increase</u>
B) Suppose that consumers are completely indifferent between two chickens and one ham. For this example, how large is the substitution bias in the official "cost-of-eating" index?
The <u>INCREASE</u> in the cost-of-eating index is <u>18</u> %.
The <u>OVERESTIMATE</u> of inflation in the cost of eating reflects substitution bias.
Explanation:
2015
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $4 $120
hams 10 $5 $50
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $250
2016
product units unit cost total
chickens 30 $5 $150
hams 10 $7 $70
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $300
A) ($300 - $250) / $250 = 20%
B)
if consumers are indifferent for 2 chickens per 1 ham, then the new basket should be assuming consumers will purchase the cheapest option:
2016
product units unit cost total
hams 25 $7 $175
<u>steaks 10 $8 $80</u>
total $255
the increase in inflation would have been = ($255 - $250) / $250 = 2%
the substitution bias = reported inflation - real inflation = 20% - 2% = 18%
