I would say the correct answer is that has an undetermined answer.If a subject has been thoroughly covered, then there is no need for this researcher to do it all over again. If it's impossible to answer, there is no need to try. If it can be answered easily, then it doesn't really require a research. This leaves us with the last option, because a researcher might want to try and determine the answer.
The author did not limit himself to literal language because he knew that figurative language would give more expressiveness and depth to the text.
As you did not show the text to which your question refers, it is not possible to show the use of figurative language in the text, but it is possible to state the reasons that led the author to use this type of language.
In the question above, we can see that the author made use of the simile, a figure of speech that allows the comparison between two elements, increasing the meaning between them.
This objective is very common in authors who use any type of figurative language in their texts. This is because figurative language can:
- Intensify parts of the text.
- Make the text deeper.
- Show more expressiveness.
- Create more impactful meanings.
- Force the reader's thinking.
- Approach topics with greater delicacy, or more aggressiveness.
It is important to emphasize that figurative language does not have a literal meaning of the words, but something more subjunctive, unlike the literal language.
More information on the link:
brainly.com/question/1430277?referrer=searchResults
The first one seems to be correct.
•"If you get a hampster, you'll be responsible for it's care," my mother told me.
Hope this helps***
Answer:
Your books will lie there until you lay them elsewhere.
<span>According to Henry David Thoreau, the best way for antislavery advocates to achieve their goals is for them to withhold all support from the government.
This is because he believed in civil disobedience - by disobeying the government, you could achieve a lot.
</span>