Answer:
I believe that Walter breached the contract because they failed to clean the sign, but I wouldn't consider it a material breach (this would be a non-material breach).
A material breach of a contract takes place when the breaching party does something (or fails to do something) that goes against the basic reason why the contract was signed. A material breach would be that Walter didn't provide the sign or that the sign never worked (didn't turn on). But in this case, the sign was a little bit dirty with little spider cobwebs appearing at its corners.
Answer with Explanation:
Amazon is fastest growing company in the world which has crossed 2 billion customer visits. It has also increased the worth of the company to $1.14 trillions. The supply chain management is where the strengths of the company lies and nobody can match the pricing strategy, quality management and other significant factors that are included in the supply chain management to ensure that the customer is having what they are paying for.
Supply chain management process includes the key partners which includes their suppliers, partners, clients and customers as well who play important roles in the supply chain process by coordinating, integrating systems with each other and are involved in the transaction-al process.
The customers are the one who interact fewer than partners, suppliers, clients, etc because all they do is order a particular product. This is the first interaction of the customer with Amazon and the last interaction is when the customer received the order. So this means they are less interacting party in this process.
Suppliers are continuously contacted and informed about the pricing, supply chain issues, etc so that the company is able to deliver its customers what they are desiring. Supply chain partners also in the process of interacting with Amazon as they have to move products from supplier to the customer. These partners are highly interacted, possess integrating systems and of transaction-al importance to the company.
Answer:
Yes, the firm Commodities Exchange Corporation is liable to E-products Inc. as it has entered into a contract with Brenda who had written authority to buy on behalf of the firm.
Explanation:
Indeed, the risk of Commodities stretches out to E-Products. This is mostly a direct result of the risk of the chief is towards the operator for the agreement the specialist is the gathering in the interest of the head. Aside from this, there is an express power having a place with Brenda as she was given the approval from the head. Because of express, an evident position E-Products got the affirmation that Commodities is being spoken to by Brenda.
There is no close to home risk of Brenda to pay for the different fringe gadgets to the E-Products. Because of evident position, it was a reality clear to E-Products that Brenda is just going about as an operator for Commodities. As these items were purchased for the utilization of the head as opposed to the individual utilization of Brenda in this way she doesn't have any obligation.
Answer: It wouldn't have any impact on Emirates business strategy in the future as Emirates 26years long plan has helped them to be at the very top of their game with continuous profit
Explanation:
It wouldn't have any impact on Emirates business strategy in the future as Emirates 26years long plan has helped them to be at the very top of their game with continuous profit. The company's human resource are lean already and they are cost effective making them to be ahead of the competitors
Answer:
Current Operation (purchase of cookies) - $0.60
Alternative - $0.2 materials
$0.15 direct labor
$0.45 without increasing capacity of which $0.3 is fixed - meaning it would still be incurred at current capacity
<u> Mel's Meals Evaluation of Alternatives</u>
Purchase Produce
$ $
Cost to Buy 0.6 -
Materials - 0.2
Direct Labor - 0.15
Overhead (Variable) - 0.15
Total Cost 0.6 0.5
Decision: Mel should not continue buying them as she would be saving $0.1 for every lunch meal.
Since there would not be an increase in the total fixed overhead if Mel's makes the cookies in-house, then the $0.3 fixed overhead is not significant in calculating the cost of producing.
Explanation:
The differential cost in this instance is $0.1 as Mel's saves that for every cookie made which multiplied by the number included in the box and by the total box prepared and sold gives = 0.1 * 2 * 10000 = $2,000 saved for making
