Answer:
$9.63
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Year Annual dividend paid
1 $1.20
2 $1.12
3 $1.12
4 $14.20
Now,
Year Annual dividend paid Present value factor Present value
1 $1.20 0.84246 1.011
2 $1.12 0.84246 0.7949
3 $1.12 0.59793 0.6696
4 $14.20 0.50373 7.1529
===============================================================
Worth of stock = 1.011 + 0.7949 + 0.6696 + 7.1529
= $9.6284 ≈ $9.63
Note:
Present value factor = [ 1 ÷ (1 + 0.187)ⁿ]
here,
n is the year
Answer:
False
The diamond-water paradox is illustrated by stating that the marginal benefit of the services provided by doctors and nurses is relatively lower than the marginal benefit of the services provided by major film stars. This implies that the supply of doctors and nurses is larger than the demand while the demand for major film stars is larger than the supply.
Explanation:
The marginal utility derived by film consumers from major film stars is higher than the marginal utility derived by patients from doctors and nurses. This is because consumers of the services of major film stars are willing to pay more for the services than consumers of the services of doctors and nurses. Though health is more crucial to life than films, but consumers place more utility value on films than they do on their health, especially after attaining the basic sound health. This actually explains the diamond water paradox, where consumers value diamond and are willing to pay more for diamond than they are willing to pay for life-sustaining water. In a layman's language, people are more willing to value the satisfaction they derive from one more additional film than they are to value the satisfaction they derive from additional healthcare. That means that people only care for the basic in healthcare. But, they can stake more to acquire more diamond.
Cost per unit
(300,000÷15,000)+20=40
Current profit
50×15,000−40×15,000=150,000
Profit change
60×15,000−40×15,000=300,000
units will knoll need to sell for profit to remain the same as before the price change is
(150,000+300,000)÷40=11,250
Answer: 3
Explanation:
The marginal rate of substitution simply means the rate at which one good will be exchanged for another good based on the current market price.
Since you like servants three times as much as robots, this implies that the utility that one gets from one servant is exactly like the utility that will be gotten from three robots.
Therefore, the utility function will be:
U = 3X + Y
Then, the marginal rate of substitution will be:
= MUX/MUY
= 3
Answer:
A decision to convert to rental should consider factors such as the taxpayer’s marginal tax rate, availability of excluding gain from the sale of a personal residence, expected growth rate of the rental property, length of time the house will be rented before being sold, cash flow from renting, effect of the passive activity rules, and rate of return on other invested funds.
How rent-to-own investments solve cash flow issues. HomeNews. by Neil Sharma 19 Mar 2019.. and you can redirect that equity to buy rent-to-own properties.". where she explained how a single investor helped seven families become homeowners while cash flowing $60,000 a year.
