Answer:
1. allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence is lack of clear conclusion or opinions about an event. It allows the narrator to exaggerate and escape the judgement. The readers does not prefer authorial reticence as there is absence of clear judgement. There author can include fantasies and magics which will end up readers concluding things their own way. It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and clear conclusion is not given right way.
Answer:
The reader will get a sense of wonder or fantasy from these kinds of locations.
Explanation:
Your average reader probably doesn't live at the bottom of the ocean, so this kind of setting can feel almost fantastical, which can be good for a utopian story, but not so great for dystopia. Many authors of dystopian stories want their readers to get a sense of "this is how <em>my</em> society could be" or to draw clear connections with the world they already experience.
It's easier for the average reader to make connections to their own life when the dystopian story takes place in a city or other setting that they have, in some way, experienced.
I believe this is the correct answer:
<span><em>So before a battle begins, the horses paw the ground; toss their heads; the light shines on their flanks; their necks curve. So Peter Walsh and Clarissa, sitting side by side on the blue sofa, challenged each other.
</em>I would choose that particular paragraphs because the metaphor is slightly unusual there - two kids, Clarissa and Peter Walsh (when they were young) are being compared to horses, which is not really a common occurrence. <em>
</em></span>
I don’t understand what this question is asking but the answer could be c that’s the best guessing answer
The correct answers are: 1, 3 and 4.
Jaden would be an effective participant in the group discussion because he has carried out thorough research on the subject, and therefore will be able to answer questions correctly.
He has also reviewed available material, such as teacher's feedback reports from previous science projects.
And at the same time he has researched projects from past science fairs, so he can support his oppinions on their success or failure.