Answer:
it is answer C. Members of an in-group typically see themselves as being quite varied, or heterogeneous.
Explanation:
This doesnt always happen.
<span>Pradeep's concern indicates that he is sensitive to the problem of cultural heritage or cultural background. The idea that culture is very diverse in different sections of the world is still a not so widely accepted thought by many. Therefore, expressing ideas about a person's particular cultural practices may come into shock to those who are not aware of such.</span>
The fact that the distribution of colors becomes unequal or different in 2 3 generations
Explanation:
Edwin is arguing that natural selection will take its course among the population of the rabbits because they all contain different features and the done that gets to be the strongest among them will be the one that reproduces the most.
Thus, this can be proven the best if there is a considerable change in the mark up of the population in a few generations.
If there is a change in the average skin color of the animals then we can say that the natural selection is working.
The answer is "conservatism".
Conservatism refers to any political reasoning that favors convention (in the feeling of different religious, social, or broadly characterized convictions and traditions) despite outer powers for change, and is incredulous of proposition for radical social change.
I believe the answer is: High-Contact culture
In high-contact culture, it is customary for each members of social group to maintain a small distance between them when they interact with another.
Because of this, when they're communicating while they're sitting, they're most likely seated next to each other (where their shoulders could touch) rather than across each other.
