Answer:
C The author draws a comparison between the chemical transformation of Jekyll into Hyde and the real-life shift from ordinary person to evil-doer.
Explanation:
<u>The author tried to show the shift of people's morals into evil with the idea of how Jekyll and his chemical transformation into the evil Mr. Hyde.</u>
<u>Dr. Jekyll was trying to prove the duality of the people and their evil and good sides, but his experiment turned bad for him. In the end, he could not control his evil side anymore. </u>
<u>The author is trying with this to show how with doing more and more evil deeds normal person can shift into the evil-doer, and that there is no turning back. </u>
<u>There is no border anymore between good and the bad side</u>, a person can't just transform back, just as Jekyll couldn't control himself with chemicals anymore at the end.
Ok, so I'm going to try my best to answer this.
My best guess would be how he said that he was able to see his answer through whoever he is talking to, then lose it again. He understood and got something, then lost it's understanding. I sincerely hope this helps.. I'm sorry I'm not very good at explaining. ^^;
Answer:
Lack security and stability
Explanation:
To be precarious is to be uncertain or not secure
The best answer is <span>character versus character
The conflict is between Ana and her mother, two characters in the story. Ana wants to continue to lounge around, as anyone would after long day at school, but her mom insists that she immediately dive into her algebra homework. Life is rough for a kid. </span>
