Answer:
Farming allowed people to control how much food was growing/being harvested
This dispute can be solved addressing the Article 3, Section 2, Clause 1, which states the following:
"The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects."
It addresses the problem by defining who will preside the dispute and establish where the involved parties must file their cases. With this being settled, the resolution to the dispute falls into Judicial Power.
The Code of Hammurabi can tell us much about ancient Babylonian society, but cannot show us everything. The law code was written for the audience of Babylonian people in its own day, especially the scribes and officers of the law. So there are many questions we would have from a distance much later in history that people then would have understood without needing explanation. The intention of the law code was to inform people of laws and punishments, not to give later generations a full view of the whole of Babylonian life. The law code was prepared by those in power in the government of Hammurabi -- we don't get any response from the people or indication of how the people then viewed the laws. And ultimately, the law code is written in a detached, impersonal way -- as legal documents generally are written. We don't get a feel for the personal lives or feelings of people living at that time in Babylonia.
Possibilism says that the physical environment is passive and man is an active agent in freedom to choose between many possibilities of environment. For possibilism, the development of human activity is the result of his initiative and man is the one who changes his condition of life, altering the natural environment. Therefore, Hong Kong and Saudi Arabia are cities and societys with Possibilism thinking because they have modified the natural environment to gigantic scales, creating their own natural environment where their cities thrive.
