Answer:
Nativists viewed immigrants as a cultural and economic threat- This is due to the fact that many immigrants were willing to work for lower wages than American citizens.
Nativists didn't believe immigrants could adopt US cultures and values. - Many Americans feared that the nice communities developing in cities like New York would only continue to feed these immigrants "refusal" to adapt American ideas.
Nativists pressued politicians to limit immigration- The nativists were successful in this, as the federal government passed the Immigration Act of 1924 which limited immigration.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Great Compromise was a compromise between large states and small states on the formation of a new constitution.
Explanation:
After American independence the Articles of Confederation resulted in many challenges in the smooth functioning of the state, and a convention was called to discuss the fomation of a new constitution also known as the Constitutional Convention 1987. Two alternatives were proposed: first was the Virginia Plan, and second the New Jersey Plan. According to the Virginia Plan there would be three branches of government namely legislature, executive and judiciary. Legislature would consist of two houses: upper and lower. And representation in these houses would be based on population. On the other hand the New Jersey Plan also proposed three branches of government. It, however, called for a single house legislature with powers of trade and taxation with each state having one vote. Small states opposed Virginia Plan; Virginia was a large state. Whereas large states opposed the New Jersey Plan; New Jersey was a small state. In the final plan a compromise was reached also known as the Great Compromise. According to the final plan the legislature would consist of two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state would have equal members in Senate; in the House of Representatives the member would be based on population. The money bill would originate from House of Representative; this satisfied the large states. This plan also served the interests of small states by giving them more seats in upper house than they could otherwise have.
The answer to the question above is this: <span>taking legal action to force the government to adhere to old treaties. This is how these native Americans do in order to bring about change. What these activists do is that they use tactics. Tactics is a kind of social movement that also reinforces social forces in order to bring about social change. Commonly, their main purpose is for defense in a nonviolent manner.</span>
The complete question is as follow:
Students on a college campus were recently surveyed about the upcoming presidential election. By and large, they agreed with the statement "College affordability is one of our top priorities." Many students stated that they had a difficult time funding their education.
<span>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?
</span>
The answer is
"Students will most probably vote for those presidential
candidates who prioritize lessening tuition expenditures".As student’s primary concern in the premise is College
affordability which logically leads to the prediction stated above, the
one who will meet their demand is the one who most probably will get their vote.
The House of Wisdom (Arabic: بيت الحكمة, romanized: Bayt al-Ḥikmah), also known as the Grand Library of Baghdad, refers to either a major Abbasid public academy and intellectual center in Baghdad or to a large private library belonging to the Abbasid Caliphs during the Islamic Golden Age.[1][2] The House of Wisdom is the subject of an active dispute over its functions and existence as a formal academy, an issue complicated by a lack of physical evidence following the collapse of the Abbasid Caliphate and a reliance on corroboration of literary sources to construct a narrative. The House of Wisdom was founded either as a library for the collections of the Caliph Harun al-Rashid in the late 8th century (then later turn
