All categories

2 years ago

Match the different brainstorming techniques to their applications. Tiles

2 answers:

7 0

Free writing is writing down first thoughts on a topic in a timed session, this does not need to be correct in grammar or arranged by relevance.
Three perspectives is when you describe the topic, trace its history and connect it to other related topics.
Lastly, clustering is grouping, connecting the written ideas for a topic using a coding scheme by using colors, shapes, etc. This is to identify how topics are related to each other. <span />

34kurt2 years ago

4 0

The correct matches are as follows:

1. FREE WRITING: Writing down first thoughts on a topic in a timed session, without pausing to check for relevance or grammar.

Brain storming is the process by which creative ideas and solutions are generated via intensive group discussion. There are lots of techniques that can be used during brain storming sessions and three of them are pre writing, clustering and three perspectives.

Free writing is a pre-writing method that involves continuous writing of thoughts and ideas for a set period of time without any regard for spelling, grammar, logical procession, punctuation, or structure; during this time one allow his thoughts to flow freely. Free writing produces the raw materials that are used for developing usable ideas. Pre writing is very useful in helping one to put down ideas that one has not considered previously.

2. CLUSTERING: Connecting ideas for a topic using different shapes and color-coding to identify how the ideas are related.

Clustering is another technique that is used during brain storming session. It involves writing down keywords or phrases that are relevant to one’s topic of interest and using drawn lines to identify the connections that exist among them. This method allows one to brainstorm in a visual manner.

3. THREE PERSPECTIVES: Describing the topic, tracing its history, and examining its connections with related topics.

Three perspectives is another method that is used during brain storming session. Considering a thing from three different sides help one to see it more completely and clearly. This method involves answering questions for each of the three perspectives considered and then looking for relationship or differences that exist among them. To do this, one has to describe the topic in detail, trace the history of the topic and find out how the topic relate to others.

You might be interested in

Which events from Acts 1 and 2 would most likely categorize the tempest as a comedy?

zalisa [80]

I believe the answer is a

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the effects of the imagery used in this poem? Check all that apply.

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

the reader can visualize fields, hear bees humming, and hear laughter

Explanation:

6 0

1 year ago

Which option correctly identifies the sequence of events in "Nelda's Adieu"?

koban [17]

Answer:

C: Nelda goes to the river, enjoys some quiet reflection, and then returns home.

Explanation:

"Nelda's Adieu" is a short piece of text about a young girl named Nelda who is about to leave her home town and home state because of her parent's employment relocation.

She goes to the river bank which runs through her hometown. She has very good memories of this place. She recalls her grandmother, picnics there, swimming challenges with her friend Tracy, thinks about what her future in new state has in store for her, and then returns home.

5 0

2 years ago

Which statement best describes an effective counterclaim to the claim in this passage? Because Dred Scott's parents were born ou

lara [203]

Answer:

Because Dred Scott and his family were born in the United States, they are citizens with all the rights granted by the Constitution.

Explanation:

According to a different source, this is the passage that the question refers to:

<em>"It will be observed, that the plea applies to that class of persons only whose ancestors were negroes of the African race, and imported into this country, and sold and held as slaves. The only matter in issue before the court, therefore, is, whether the descendants of such slaves, when they shall be emancipated, or who are born of parents who had become free before their birth, are citizens of a State, in the sense in which the word "citizen” is used in the Constitution of the United States. . . . . . . The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States."</em>

In this passage, the opinion of the author is that Dred Scott cannot be considered an American citizen because he is the descendant of slaves. The author argues that slaves were not considered as "citizens" when the Constitution was written, and therefore, their children cannot be citizens either. However, a counterclaim to this statement would be the argument that Dred Scott and his family should be considered citizens because they were born in the United States, and therefore, deserve all the rights that citizenship grants them.

6 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

In which two ways can sentences be correctly combined? After hearing the weather forecast, Amira remember to bring her umbrella.

Nana76 [90]

The writing on the passenger-side mirror of your car says "Warning! Objects in mirror are closer than they appear"(Figure 1) . There is no such warning on the driver's mirror. Consider a typical convex passenger-side mirror with a focal length of -80 cm. A 1.5-m-tall cyclist on a bicycle is 28 m from the mirror.

7 0

2 years ago