Answer:
Yes. Roy can successfully challenge this arbitration award in court.
Explanation:
According to the law, an arbitration clause is a part of the contract between Roy and Secure Investments, Inc. that deals with these parties' rights and options in the event of a legal dispute over their contract. Like in most arbitration clauses, Roy and Secure Investments, Inc. must have agreed not to sue each other but instead, to resolve their disputes through the arbitration process. But the res judicata effect produced through an arbitration can either be challenged and appealed against or enforced. Roy, depending on the merits of his case, can make a successful appeal against the arbitration award and not against the arbitration itself.
Answer:
Interest expense to be recorded on Dec 31 2018= $8425
Explanation:
Lets first understand what adjusting entry is? Adjusting entries are entries passed at the reporting date in order to comply to the accruals concept of accounting. Accruals concept requires entities to record revenue and expenses in the period that they occur and should not wait until they are received or paid respectively. Revenues and expenses should be matched for the period and recorded.
Now that we have understood adjusting entry, lets calculate interest expense that should be recorded on December 31 2018. So Arch Services records interest payment on a semi-annul basis (i.e every 6 months). Now the bonds are issued on November (i.e two months to the reporting date), considering the accruals concept Arch Services will have to record interest for two months.
The interest expense is calculated as follows:
Annual Interest= $337000×15%
Annual Interest= $50550
Lets convert it into monthly basis as follows:
Monthly interest expense= $4212.5
Interest for two months would be = $4212.5×2
Interest expense to be recorded on Dec 31 2018= $8425
Answer:
1. He has not developed the idea yet
2. His employer knows he his a pacifist so he has the delima is he ethically correct to not develop a product that can be used for warfare.
Explanation:
In this scenario Ben signed an agreement with his employer that all ideas he has developed on the job and while working with the company is a property of the company.
This is a common agreement that gives a company property rights over work developed by their employees.
However since Ben is a pacifist he has an ethical dilemma when he has an idea that can weaponize an ultrasonic range-finding device.
He is justifying his decision by saying the idea has not been developed yet and his employer will not expect him to develop such technology since he is a pacifist.
Answer: a) Maude likely can successfully sue her employer for violation of a Whistleblower Protection Law.
Explanation:
Whistleblowers are people who call attention to illegal activities in their workplace which means that Maude qualifies as one.
In order to encourage people to speak out and call attention to illegal activities in the workplace, there are several laws at both Federal and State level that are aimed at protecting employees should they report said illegal activities.
This is why it is likely that Maude can sue her employer for violation of such laws but she must do so speedily to ensure that she can be helped as some of these laws tend to be limited.
