Answer:
Explanation:The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (French: Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du citoyen de 1789), set by France's National Constituent Assembly in 1789, is a human civil rights document from the French Revolution.[1]
The Declaration was drafted by the Abbé Sieyès and the Marquis de Lafayette, in consultation with Thomas Jefferson.[2] Influenced by the doctrine of "natural right", the rights of man are held to be universal: valid at all times and in every place, pertaining to human nature itself. It became the basis for a nation of free individuals protected equally by the law. It is included in the beginning of the constitutions of both the Fourth French Republic (1946) and Fifth Republic (1958) and is still current. Inspired by the Enlightenment philosophers, the Declaration was a core statement of the values of the French Revolution and had a major impact on the development of freedom and democracy in Europe and worldwide.[3]
The 1789 Declaration, together with the 1215 Magna Carta, the 1689 English Bill of Rights (1689), the 1776 United States Declaration of Independence, and the 1789 United States Bill of Rights, inspired in large part the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Answer: There were several ways the Italians living in America were affected because of the Emancipation Proclamation. The answers that apply are; they faced travel restrictions, they lost income, they were interned, and they had to be relocated within the United States. However, they did have curfews, but they were not relaxed curfews, per my research.
Explanation:
The American Italian population were targeted during WW2. They were put into the internment camps with the Japanese citizens during the same time. Many families were torn apart and relocated to other parts of America. With the fathers being in camps, the families lost their main source of income. The Italians were called "enemy aliens." Their belonging were confiscated and had to endure curfews. In October 1942, it was declared that they were no longer thought to be "enemies of the state."
I believe c is the answer because the word it's is saying it is
The answer is most likely D
Explanation:
I used my best judgement to answer this as well as process of elimination, I immediately eliminated b and c. then it was between a and d for answers. I thought D made the most sense from what I know about ancient civilizations, and prehistoric history.
Judging by the opinion, if the students in Tinker v. Des Moines had done more than wear black armbands and had instead engaged in "disruptive" speech that got in the way of their classmates learning, they likely would have been ruled against. This is the type of analysis that the Court had to do in cases like the infamous "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case wherein a student relayed that message during a school event.
