<span>1. The eventual election of Andrew Jackson lead to acceptance of the common man. Once you get through the biography Andrew Jackson, you will definitely get to know that his period of being a president is called the Era of the Rise of the Common Man. Even though he considered himself as a 'common man', he made the most powerful office in the three branches of government out of office of president. He was a wise man with strong political issues.
2) Increased suffrage and the development of new political parties in the early 1800s indicate expansion of democracy. States decided not to deal with the suffrage and just let everything go with a flow, causing a wave of new democracy. In 1820's many white males won the right to vote that made parties be more organized which completely changed the previous democracy.<span>
</span></span>
Answer:
Francisco Pizarro
After years of preliminary exploration and military skirmishes, 168 Spanish soldiers under conquistador Francisco Pizarro, his brothers, and their native allies captured the Sapa Inca Atahualpa in the 1532 Battle of Cajamarca.
"The Soviet action was condemned by other global powers, whereas the United States had a high degree of multilateral support" is the one that best describes <span>the relationship between the Afghan-Soviet conflict of the 1980s and the U.S.-Iraq conflict that began in 2003. The correct option is option "D". </span>
Philosophers applied REASONING AND LOGIC (a) to physical and social aspects of people’s lives. People started implementing new ideas and philosophies to their lives. They were getting tired of the OPPRESSIVE (c) power of the monarchy. They wanted to experience a change in the way they were treated. So people started demanding RIGHTS (a).
<span>Presidents often use executive agreements to sidestep the constitutional "advice and consent" of the senate that is required for formal ratification of treaties. In short, the president can decide what law must be passed without ratifying it by the senate. But this kind of agreements, without the senates's consent is still legally binding so long as the agreement itself is not illegal with regards to the laws of the congress.</span>
