Answer: The best option that can change the court decision is if "Uncle Buck included a label on the car that suggested that a buyer obtain an inspection for the Ford Escape before purchasing the car". Option C is the most correct option.
Explanation: The court has held Uncle Buck guilty of deceit because his statement on the Ford escape car was found to be false and deceiving costumers about the car.
Uncle Buck may be right in his argument, that the car engine was very good at the point of sale. The fault in the engine developed due to rough usage of the car by Monica. But because the court has not means or method to validate is argument, so it was proven void and non exiting.
The only way Uncle Bill yard argument about the car would be valid was if Uncle bulk yard has stated, that the car engine should be tested before purchase. If this was stated the court will assume Uncle Buck was right, that Monica has tested the car engine and observed that it was working perfectly, before she purchased the car.
Answer:
The correct option is A: Aristotle argues that justice is giving people what they deserve, while Rawls believes that moral desert is irrelevant when it comes to a just distribution of goods.
Explanation:
Rawls was dismissive towards the idea of moral desert whereas Aristotle believed that the distribution of goods should be done on the basis of merit. The two philosophers had their own line of logic and having differing point of views does not mean that they cancel out one another in any way.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
Answer:
B. you want to be able to have a extra pair close by
Explanation:
