Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?:
The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.
In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence.:
During the years 1740 to 1770 the strain between England and therefore the 13 colonies grew into a full scale war. tormented by unjust taxation and tyrannical rule, the colonists tried to alter and influence English people policy through repeated petitioning and boycotts. After failing to influence England through peaceful measures, war was the colonists’ only option. The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. in line with England however the colonists weren't justified in waging war. England was the native land and therefore the colonists paid very cheap taxes within the world. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in return the debt was expected. The 13 colonies unnecessarily resorted to violence and propaganda within which a minority of Patriots influenced other colonists to believe a “New England” problem. Despite England’s reasons on why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists within the Declaration of Independence clearly stated their grievances and case against England, declaring to the planet the explanations that caused them to separate and fight to become the us of America.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Dr. A was co-authing with W.R. Kapsner, C.A. Shuman, and C.R. Stearns, among others in 1994.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The collaborations done by scientists are mostly to serve the purpose of sharing expertise and dispensing assistance in the studies that are carried out in specific subjects.
- These collaborations often culminate in the discovery of new traits and attributes of the subjects in which the studies are conducted.
- It can be said that through expertise sharing, the knowledge base is increased considerably.
<span>These are cross-cultural terminations. They take place when people, coming from different backgrounds, may misunderstand the meanings behind certain actions and attribute ill-intent to statements that may be perfectly innocuous on their face. In addition, these conflicts lead to a more difficult work environment or a failure to complete work projects.</span>
Answer:
Electic approach.
Explanation:
This is explained to be an integrative counselling approach where the different theories are been fused together to solve a clinical and psychological issue. It is particularly seen to contain human complexity properly without to dissect or have their mental record been set straight before the therapy. This psychological approach also gives patients the room to try focusing on themselves totally by getting proper assistance with of their challenges from the same therapist.
It also gives therapist a detailed picture of the patient he is dealing instead of making assumptions on several unknown factors.
The correct answer is a confounding variable.
A confounding variable refers to a factor other than an independent variable (IV) that influences an outcome or dependent variable (DV) of a research study. In this instance, Layla's high alcohol tolerance is a confounding variable because despite being a<span>ssigned to the experimental group that received the highest amount of alcohol to drink (the IV), a factor other than the IV- the confounding variable- led to the DV (her driving ability). </span>
