This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Answer:
Explanation:
Stephen Austin was a settler and lawyer who played a large part in the separation of Texas from Mexico. He brought many people from Mexico into Texas to help the state grow. He influenced many people to come to the state from other states too.
The three qualities were simplicity,brevity and rationality.
He borrowed much of his ideals from classical writers of the roman Republic. he believed that the words of truth are simple.
Answer:
The process to study each subject is different from one another because of the difference in the sources, methods, and area of study. But what makes history different as a subject on how one extracts information from the sources. While in other subjects one can data is directly accessible that provides knowledge, in history, one has to look for the critical evaluation of the sources of data, the conditions in which the data was produced, the possibility of the written influence from his environment, etc. Therefore while studying history we the data collection process should be carefully opted.
Answer:
1. Spain at the time owned the Louisiana territory and shared boundary with the Mississippi River in the east
2. United States government at the time has no $15million
Explanation:
1. Spain continued to harass trade moving down the Mississippi, occasionally blocking all use of the river. Why? - Because at the time, before the Louisiana purchase, Spain owned the Louisiana territory and shared boundary with the Mississippi River in the east. Hence, they occasionally blocking all use of the river.
2. Leaders of the US wanted to buy New Orleans but Congress was unable to put together any sort of offer. Why? - Because, at the time, the cost of buying which is $15million at the time, was difficult to come by the government of the United States, which they later borrow from two European bank.
