Answer:
B - Both speakers use evidence of soldiers’ sacrifices as proof of national unity.
Explanation:
B. This shows that the translators were highly efficient and skilled in coding and de-coding without a single error.
Answer:
Sentence A.
Explanation:
When using someone else's thoughts, ideas, sentences etc. in your work, it's necessary to avoid plagiarism, by properly quoting them.
There are basically two essential things to pay attention to:
- when paraphrasing someone one must put internal quotation just after the paraphrased piece of information. Internal quotation consists at least of the author's last name and page number from which the information was taken.
- when quoting someone (using his work word-by-word), the quoted content must be placed between quotation marks, followed by internal quotation.
Of course, regardless of the internal quotation, the proper citation must be provided at the end of the work, in the citation list.
So, with all this in mind, we can see that sentence A failed to obey these rules, which marks it as plagiarism.
Below are the answers:
<span>Both are beautiful in their own way.
</span><span>Both struggle in their environment.
</span><span> Both are rare and unusual.
Doodle and the Scarlet Ibis are comparable in that both are uncommon and delicate creatures. Wonderful in their own specific manner, yet strangely unique and uncommon. The Ibis is red and at last, Doodle is left in a contorted stance like the Ibis and he, as well, is red with blood.
The winged creature is indigenous to the tropics and does not have a place where he is, and Doodle can't satisfy his sibling's gauges of what a sibling ought to be. The demise of Doodle and the ibis have a few likenesses. They both pass on due in part to a tempest. They both are red after death.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no further specific references, we can comment on the following.
This is my report.
It is always interesting to know more details about the life of famous people. In this case, this female singer that gave a lecture about the life of a musician was interesting, although she talked in general terms. I think it would have been more interesting if she could have talked about the details of the music business for new musicians or the way she had to overcome adversities to become a popular artist.
I say this because there are many texts and references on the internet about the music business. However, there is such little information about the specifics, the details. And popular artists like her could be able to share good information with students about the details of the music business.
My suggestion is that we could invite these famous people but we should ask them to center their speech on specific issues so the talk could be useful. If they talk about general issues or about their lives, many books and pages already include their bios and general information.
We, as students, need more focused topics, that only listen to general information or the artist's public life that is already known.
