Answer:
<em>The best option among all the four options given would be the </em><em>second option </em><em>which talks about the oppressive Policies that where it enacted against both faced by the Diems.
</em>
Explanation:
It was seen that the country that had majority of Buddhist residing, there was a Catholic and was seen to be favouring the Catholics in all the fields. Which the Buddhist in the country found very oppressing thus resulted in in the people going against Diem
.
In a confederacy, there is no such thing as a strong central government and the purpose of a confederacy is to protect the states in it from foreign incursion, not to solve domestic problems which are all handled by individual local governments. The articles of confederation established such a confederacy of the first states and they needed the constitution in order to turn into a federation.
The naturalization process involves several steps including taking and passing a two-part test. It consists of a process through which an immigrant becomes a citizen of the United States through the naturalization process. Naturalization applicants should demonstrate the ability to read, write, and speak words in the English language. They should also have knowledge and understanding of the U.S. history and government (civics).
The naturalization test usually consists of two components; an English and a civics component.
~ Montesquieu, known as the Balanced Democrat would be the best choice.
Montesquieu did not describe a social contract as such. But he said that the state of war among individuals and nations led to human laws and government.
Montesquieu wrote that the main purpose of government is to maintain law and order, political liberty, and the property of the individual. Montesquieu opposed the absolute monarchy of his home country and favored the English system as the best model of government.
Montesquieu somewhat misinterpreted how political power was actually exercised in England. When he wrote The Spirit of the Laws, power was concentrated pretty much in Parliament, the national legislature. Montesquieu thought he saw a separation and balancing of the powers of government in England.
Montesquieu viewed the English king as exercising executive power balanced by the law-making Parliament, which was itself divided into the House of Lords and the House of Commons, each checking the other. Then, the executive and legislative branches were still further balanced by an independent court system.
Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial powers were separate and kept each other in check to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. He believed that uniting these powers, as in the monarchy of Louis XIV, would lead to despotism. While Montesquieu’s separation of powers theory did not accurately describe the government of England, Americans later adopted it as the foundation of the U.S. Constitution.
The answer is: c. They show that the Court has expanded the groups that can expect equal protection of the law
In the past, the protection of the law only specifically mentioned for Male citizens who belong in racial majority.
Over the centuries, the court keep expanded the groups that can achieve protection by the laws (such as women and minorities) and started granted them with various rights which previously only owned by white male citizens (such as the right to vote)
