Answer:
1: The first sentence lists specific conditions followed by what might eventually happen.
3: The second sentence starts with the expression “for this reason.”
4: The second sentence lists potential consequences of the situation described.
Explanation:
"The Prince" (1532) is a political treatise by Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) who was an Italian diplomat, politician, historian, and political philosopher.
The Chapter 5 of the book is "Conquered Free States, with their own laws and orders"
Option 1 might or might not be a cause-and-effect structure. It might not necessarily be cause-and-effect structure. Two events happening one after and other does not show that the first one is the cause and the second one effect. But, it is also true that in cause-and-effect structure one event (result) happens followed by another event.
Option 3 is correct because it clearly shows a cause-and-effect structure <u>(for this reason).</u>
Option 4 is correct because the events stated in the second sentence are the consequences (effect/result) of the situations described in the first sentence.
Option 2 is not cause-and-effect structure. "On the one hand" and "on the other hand" is used to describe two parallel and contrasting ideas. Hence, it is a contrasting structure.
Option 5 is not a cause-and-effect structure because the phrase <em>"citizen of the conquered city"</em> in no way shows the cause and effect of any situation
These rights are often referred to as Miranda rights. The purpose of such notification is to preserve the admissibility of their statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
n the United States, the right to remain silent is designed to protect a person who is undergoing police questioning or trial. This right may help a person avoid making self-incriminating statements. This I believe would be the fifth amendment.
The Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination applies when an individual is called to testify in a legal proceeding.
The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger
In criminal cases, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids “double jeopardy,” and protects against self-incrimination.
You didn't post any passage...
Both chose genres that present a true story of the Holocaust as one experienced it.
