Hello. You forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
"A. Change "razor thin" to "extremely tiny." B. Change "voted out of office" to "removed from their current positions." C. Change "don't have the money" to "do not make enough profit." D. Change "definitely not the way to go" to "a completely worthless idea."
Answer:
C. Change "don't have the money" to "do not make enough profit."
Explanation:
The expression "has no money" does not provide accurate and consistent information with a formal language text, when that text refers to the economic conditions of an establishment. "Not having money" is not an economic term that fits the context of the text, which should only use economic terms to maintain the formal tone of the writing.
In this case, the best way to replace this expression and provide a more formal tone would be through the expression "do not make enough profit", which justifies the statement given by the author and maintains the formal tone of the writing.
Answer:
B. Show an example of the United States' indifference to the plight of the Jews
Explanation:
A part of the text <em>clearly shows</em> that Eliezer Wiesel is trying to show America's indifference to the plight of the Jews. He is not able to understand why and how it happened on the highest level in the greatest democracy and the most generous of all new nations
<em>"A thousand people – In America, the great country, the greatest democracy, the most generous of all new nations in modern history. What happened? I don’t understand. </em><em>Why the indifference…..</em><em>"</em>
There is not mention of sending more troops, death of President Franklin, or any evidence or mention of 1000 Jews killed on St. Louis.
The correct answer is that "Jim is glad to see Huck and embraces him". Jim loves Huck very much and respects him, and because he is a slave, he wouldn't be able to yell at him, nor try to scare him. The correct answer is the third option.
For Zhuangzi, knowledge is relative to the perspectives we have of reality at the moment. This means that we will never know for sure whether what we know at the moment is real or not. It depends on our perspective. He explains this by showing how one day he dreamed that he was a butterfly, at the moment the dream is happening, his knowledge was limited to the butterfly's perspective, when he woke up, he realized that that perspective was not real, because now he had knowledge with his own perspective, however he could not confirm if they were real too, because he could be a butterfly, dreaming that he was a man, at that moment.
With that, Zhuangzi makes a connection with the myth of Plato's cave, showing that our perceptions and the feelings we feel about the environment in which we are inserted are not enough to make us sure of anything.
<span>In classical antiquity, an oracle was a person or agency considered to provide wise and insightful counsel or prophetic predictions or precognition of the future, inspired by the gods. As such it is a form of divination.</span>
