The answer might be Present tense narration
The words that support the inference that making sugar was difficult are;
- "the work was governed by extremely tight, rigid discipline"
- "careful organization did not solve the second problem with sugar"
In describing the plantations that existed in Jamaica during the era of slavery, the excerpt mentions that between 50 and up to a hundred workers were required to work in the plantations.
The Muslims and Christians organized methods to use their slaves in the plantations. Still, these did not yield many results.
So, despite the rigid discipline and careful organization, sugar making was still difficult.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/13652825
Answer:
The main difference is that you can use the Second Conditional to describe a result that can happen although it is unlikely that it will, while you use the Third Conditional to describe a situation that could have happened in the past had a condition been met.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Have a good night ma´am/sir.
Be safe!
The most accurate summary of Kaku’s argument is: <span>Amber has allowed scientists to study DNA that has been preserved over millions of years
Amber fossils isolate them from any oxygen that could prevent the preservation of their tissue. This allows the body to maintain it's formed for a long period of time.</span>