Explanation:
Case description
A construction company is owned by Mr. Jonathan Simpson A subcontractor was working with him and when he has completed the work he was paid $10,750 but the actual payment was $ 12.750. But after short time the contractor contacted the owner of the company to pay him the replacement check, When the owner checked his accounting system he found something wrong is happening in the company’s account system. The owner knows that only one person other that can access the account. So he wants to collect the evidences against the employee. The first aim should be to hire the forensic
investigator from the investigating company to collect the evidences against him. Computer forensics Computer forensics involves the digital evidence in support of crime, or administrative cases to be used as evidence. The evidence obtained should be legal. authentic, and admissible. It is different from data recovery, work forensics and disaster recovery in many aspects. In computer forensic we search for an unknown data which was hidden by the suspect or user which can be used as a valid proof against the suspect.
Answer:Enlighten him
Explanation:
All Jeff need to do is to get some information about hard drugs....its risk and consequences.... Including facts that he might be caught and tried and charged to jail......for a long period of time
Answer: Dale and Esty
Explanation:
According to the rule of strict product liability, seller or manufacturer or distributor of the product ,item and service that is defected is held liable. This rule is implemented even if the mistake is done by the buyer or any other party.
The considerations and analyzing of the product done by manufacture to assurance about non-defective is also not considered .
Thus, according to the question, Cold Play Corporation is considered liable for the defective product to Dale and Esty. Due to the defective product ,Dale faced injury as well as Esty being a bystander got into the accident and injured herself because of snowmobile.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because you don't want for them to crash into you.
Answer:
If Holt and Collins retain the right to a Class action.
Explanation:
Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside of court. The Parties involved in the case refer their disputes to an arbitrator who will making a decision after reviewing the evidence and listening to the parties.
Arbitration clauses can be mandatory or voluntary, and the arbitrator's decision may be binding or nonbinding. (binding means you are not going to court again, but would abide by the decisions if the arbitrator).
Furthermore, the Arbitration is a legal technique used by the parties involved in a dispute to resolve the disputes outside the courts, the parties refer the disputes to one or more persons called either the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal", by whose decision (the "award") they agree to be bound.
Then A "class action" lawsuit or the
"mass tort litigation" is one in which a group of people with the same or similar injuries caused by the same product or action sue the defendant as a group. It can also be called the "multi-district litigation".
If Holt and Collins decide to retain the right to a Class action, it will definitely not be the result of an arbitration.