Answer:
A conclusion that is in favour:
"Using public money to maintain national landmarks is a good policy in the sense that a national landmark is a public good: no one can be excluded from enjoying the view of a national landmark like the Arch in St. Louis for example.
Because they are public goods, national landmarks are not likely to be profitable or provided by the private sector in a free market, and for this reason, government intervention in the form of public money becomes necessary".
The BLM seeks to create procedures to protect certain species to ensure their recovery and to promote their conservation. This is to occur so that in the future ESA and BLM policies are no longer needed to protect these species.
Answer:
My friend John, who owns the chocolate Lab puppy, is getting ready to leave for a trip.
Explanation:
"Nonrestrictive modifiers" are <em>words or phrases that follows a noun.</em> It is separated by commas since it presents an information that is not essential to the meaning of the sentence as a whole.
Among the choices above, the choice <em>"My friend John, who owns the chocolate Lab puppy, is getting ready to leave for a trip" </em>uses the commas correctly in order to separate its non restrictive modifier.
The non restrictive modifier in the sentence is "who owns the chocolate Lab puppy." This modifies "My friend John." However, it is not an essential information in order to determine the meaning of the whole sentence since the sentence already mentioned the named John.
Answer: I believe the and is C) Happy