Answer:
thesis statement Geronimo became a bitter warrior after his family was attacked by José Maria Carrasco.
evidence The writer gathered evidence from Geronimo’s autobiography, which includes facts and anecdotes from his life. For example, Geronimo burned his belongings, his children’s toys, and two tipis after the Mexican attack.
structure The essay reads well, but it lacks the traditional structure of essays. Some irrelevant discussion is included as well.
strategies The writer uses a cause-and-effect strategy and an appeal to emotions (pathos). He argues that the cause was the Mexican attack on the Apache camp, which resulted in the death of his mother, wife, and three children. The effect was Geronimo becoming a ruthless warrior.
The appeal to emotions (pathos) comes in the description of the attack on Geronimo’s family. Rielly also describes Geronimo standing alone in a river after the attacks as a way of showing his state of mind after losing his family.
fallacies Edward Rielly’s article about Geronimo doesn’t seem to have many obvious logical fallacies.
overall quality This is a good essay. It focuses on providing solid supporting evidence, and it demonstrates clear cause-and-effect relationships.
Explanation:
Answer:
Real examples of promethean ambition can be seen in scientists who want to use stem cells to change biological situations.
Explanation:
Prometheus is a god of Greek mythology, who stole fire from Olympus, against the will of the gods, to deliver that fire to men. Based on this myth, the term "promethean ambition" is used to describe characters in literature who want to dominate and modify nature at their leisure.
As we know, there are many characters who can fit the term "promethean ambition", however we can also have examples of the application of this term in real life. An example that can be cited are scientists who develop research and ways to use stem cells to modify or prevent the existence of some biological situations, such as malformed organs and bones.
Answer:
We are trying to fix the problem.
:)
Explanation:
Answer:
a rejected alternative
Explanation:
In the context, two friends were discussing which place or restaurant to go and eat some thing. One of them suggested to go to "Sharky". He even added the advantage of watching the game on the television which is in the restaurant "Sharky".
But the other friend rejected the restaurant "Sharky" as it was too noisy and chooses another alternative and wishes to go to "Pie Hub" and get a pizza from there.
Thus "Sharky's is too noisy" is a rejected alternative.
