Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
Answer:
Limited liability partnership (LLP) or a limited liability company (LLC)
Explanation:
Both the LLP and LLC provide limited liability to the owners and they are both pass through tax entities. That means that they are not directly taxed, instead their owners are taxed.
Depending on where Tina and Aaliyah live, they might not be able to open a LLP, and instead they will need to start a LLC. Any of them will satisfy their needs, but starting a LLC is a little bit more complicated and can cost more money. An LLC is usually better if there are several partners, but in this case if they can avoid the cost of opening a LLC it would be better for them.
Answer:
A) the probability that the asset will pay well is 51.16% and the probability that it pays poorly is 48.84%.
B) She should not invest in the asset because the expected value = the price asset, there is no expected profit.
Explanation:
There are 2 probable returns:
- Asset will pay well = P = $45,000
- Asset will pay poorly = 1 - P = $2,000
since the principal = $20,000, and the expected value = $20,000, the expected value equation would be:
45,000p + 2,000(1 - p) = 20,000
45,000 + 2,000 - 2,000p = 20,000
43,000p = 22,000
p = 0.5116 or 51.16%
1 - p = 48.84%
Leadership skills and compassion good vision
