<span>Using these words allows Hamilton to describe the powers of these branches of government in familiar terms so that he can then contrast them with the powers he envisions for an independent judiciary.
</span><span>By expressing complete certainty in his position, Hamilton presents his argument in favor of an independent judiciary as one to which no logical objection exists.
</span>
Answer:
The <u>athlete's</u> goal is to win <u>medals</u> at all of her <u>competitions</u> this season.
Explanation:
The given sentence has been rewritten by converting each bold word as per its use in the sentence. The word 'athlete' will employ an apostrophe followed by s('s) to show possession of the goal. While the word 'medal' will be converted to the plural 'medals' as there is no indefinite article given to clarify that the athlete is willing to win only one medal. Similary, 'competition' will be converted to plural 'competitions' as signaled by the use of 'all' which signifies plurality. Thus, the <u>first shows possession, and the other two reflect 'more than one.</u>'
While I cannot tell what is bolded, I can try to help.
A subtle distinction is a nuance.
A preference could be an inclination.
To condemn someone is like denouncing them.
Old fashioned could be quaint.