1.) The Japanese expansion in east Asia began in 1931 with the invasion of Manchuria and continued with a brutal attack on China (specifically southern China)
2.) Japan attacked French Indochina in 1940 as an effort to embargo all imports into China, including war supplies that China purchased from the U.S. This move prompted the United States to embargo all oil exports from Japan. (This one is probably natural resources)
3.) The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in an attempt to completely negate the United States' forces from counterattacking their capture of the Philippine Islands
The correct answer is number 2) the North manufactured goods to sell mainly to the Southern states, but the South preferred imports.
The tariffs controversy exposed sectional differences between the North and the South in that the North manufactured goods to sell mainly to the Southern states, but the South preferred imports.
The Congress of the United States passed the Tariff 0f 1828 on May 19, in order to protect the production of goods in the country, specifically in the states of the North. But Southern states immediately opposed to the act, heading by South Carolina, that considered the decision as to the "Tariff of Abominations," because the act set a 38% tax of most imported good. This represented a negative impact on the economy of the Southern states.
Answer:
The Second Battle of the Marne caused the Central Powers to collapse. In July 1918, the Allies and Germans clashed at the Second Battle of the Marne. ... With the arrival of 2 million more American troops, the Allied forces began to advance steadily toward Germany. The war would soon be over.
Explanation:
The correct answer is b) to make a subtle threat of force to the Japanese
Perry was willing to display the readiness of the U.S to use force so as to convince the Japanese authorities to accept the offer and open their ports as well as offer protection to stranded Americans
Answer: Yes. The support of non-Native Alaskans was an important factor which lead to the settlement of Alaska Native land claims. It is consistent with the evidence presented in this learning block.
Explaination:
The non-Natives Alaskans knew how the Natives Alaskans were dealt with in the Southeastern United States. They learnt from their mistakes so took a different approach when dealing with the natives from Alaska. The U.S. Courts were more sympathetic towards the natives due to past history. The federal government was in favor to help the native which was not so in the past.
