<span>B. We were walking by the lake when we heard a siren.
C. By the time I graduated, I had attended three different high schools.
D. Though he had been rude at first, Rupert eventually won over the congregation
These three sentences are all correct, because even if the verb tense shifts it still makes sense within the context of the situation.</span>
Answer:
Dr. Tyson's interview is not well-organized, while his preface
is clearly organized so the reader can easily understand it.
Explanation:
An in depth study of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein would not be a short research paper. Ideally you would have to have a more specific research question/focus on one aspect of the novel. An in depth study is too broad.
An analysis of protagonists in Jane Austen's works once again would not be a short research paper, if it was limited to one or two of her books then yes but not all of them.
A comparison of Homers Illiad and Odyssey once again is too broad a topic and if you were to compare everything in both novels you would be looking at a rather lengthy research paper.
Moby D*ck is full of symbolism and if you could find a way to summarize effectively and succinctly the story and maybe just focus on the actual whale as the subject matter and what it represents in the book you could definitely make a good relatively short research paper out of it.
Alternatively would be an analysis of Edgar Allan Poe's narrative style in The Black Cat. The Black Cat is a short story and ideal for this type of research paper.
Answer: I believe it's C
Explanation: Horribly is a negative adverb, but added to modify the adjective, good, it creates a sense of negativity and positivity.
