An strong argument For using the atomic bomb is that it will show the power and the technology that the USA has. An strong argument Against is that it will cause a massacre as well as an devastating environmental impact. Remember that arguments have to be valid and convincing. They should also be well supported with explanations and examples.
Answer:
"What island is it?" Rainsford asked.
- This is the first time Rainsford has made this journey
.
"I've seen you pick off a moose moving... at four hundred yards."
- Rainsford is an excellent hunter.
"Who cares how a jaguar feels?
- Rainsford does not sympathize the animals he kills.
"It will be light in Rio," promised Whitney
- Whitney has been to Rio before.
Explanation:
The short story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell tells the story of how a famed and experienced hunter became the victim of a much more dangerous man. The story also delves into the roles of the hunter and the hunted, and how the two roles are twisted in this story.
When Sanger Rainsford asked Whitney where they are, this shows that he is not familiar with the place and is his first time journeying to this place.
Whitney's statement of him having <em>"seen you pick off a moose moving"</em> shows how excellent Rainford is in his hunting skills.
Rainsford's statement of <em>"who cares how a jaguar feels"</em> shows his unsympathetic attitude towards the animals he hunts.
Whitney's prediction of <em>"it will be light in Rio"</em> shows he has been there before.
With the help of inductive reasoning, he reached the conclusion that segregation laws are all unjust.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the three part deductive statement, the major premise was all the laws that degrade the human personality are unjust. The minor premise was segregation laws degrade the human personality and therefore the conclusion was that the segregation laws are unjust.
This conclusion has been derived from the evidences like the hate filled policemen kick brothers and sisters. African American caught in an airtight prison of poverty. They were excluded from amusement parks. All this degraded the human personality and were unjust.
Answer:
A. Amused
C. Disappointed
Explanation:
Stone's attitude has changed towards its audience from amused to disappointed because audience did not gained interest in the plot and there were only few who waited for the climax.
The author of the play is disappointed with the audience reaction and he finds that audience did not find interest in this play. He is amused as well as disappointed from the reaction.
The truth for this is that Wiesel is like a conscience,reminding people of the evil of persecuting others. Also he acts as a warning signal because he is cautioning others to be on guard against intol<span>erance.It is then more than fitting to call wiesel part conscience and part warning signal. </span>
