Trisha: Gaby can’t you see that grandma crossing the street. She might hit the speeding vehicle. What is your answer?

Which BEST shows how the author of Passage 1

stiv31 [10]

Answer:

The city is portrayed as a challenge for Caroline to either use its advantages to mature or to succumb to its dangers.

Explanation:

Caroline Meeber (sister Carrie) is an eighteen year old lady who left her village in Wisconsin in search of a green pastures in Chicago. She was out to pursue her dream of wealth and fame.

The setting of passage 1 is a Chicago-bound train where Caroline, leaving home for the first time to stay with her sister, battles with her thoughts - how would life in the city be?

Nostalgic feelings of home are some quickly replaced with her expectations of city life - lights and sounds of a fast-paced city, moving cars, big houses and mansions, fame and affluence.

Even though Caroline was naive in thinking, her tastes and desires were certainly very high. She was also nervous and a bit fearful not knowing exactly what life in the city would offer her.

4 0

2 years ago

Read the excerpt from A History of Women’s Suffrage by Stanton, Anthony, and Gage. The broader demand for political rights has n

mixer [17]

Women's lack of political rights is the root of their troubles

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is an example of inductive reasoning?

lakkis [162]

The accurate example of inductive reasoning among the options is it has snowed every day this week, so it will likely snow tomorrow. Furthermore, inductive reasoning is about a wide generalization from detailed observations.

EXPLANATION:

Inductive reasoning, as known as induction, is one of two fundamental types of inference. It is a reasonable relationship between two declarations: the first one is known as the premise, while the second one is known as a conclusion and ought to face a kind of reasonable relationship with the premise.

Induction, particularly, is an inference in accordance with reasonable probabilities. The conclusion may also be true if the premise is true. This is the opposite of deductive conclusions, where the inference must be true if the premise is.

Examples

Premise: The sun has set in the West and risen in the East.

Conclusion: The sun will perhaps endure to set in the West and rise in the East.

Typically, inductive reasoning produces general conclusions from specific premises. They started with a particular observation of a pattern, and after that, deduce that there is a general rule. For instance, most people know the general rule in the example above: the sun constantly rises and sets in the same way. This rule is getting along with a large accumulation of points of data, not to mathematical "evidence" or derivatives of the other abstract rules.

LEARN MORE:

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Which of the following is an example of inductive reasoning? brainly.com/question/10730244

KEYWORDS : inductive reasoning, induction, observation, example of inductive reasoning

Subject : English

Class : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : Inductive Reasoning

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Eduardo crept along the side of the house — he didn't want his mother to see him. Her reaction to being startled was one of the

GrogVix [38]

The answer i think it would be "D"

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Common Lit answers tp 2 PLZZZZZ!

anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

A

Admiring

B

Sentimental

C

Compassionate

D

Disapproving

2.

PART B: Record a quote from paragraph 1 that best supports your answer to Part A.

3.

What is revealed about the narrator in paragraph 6? What is the author’s likely purpose for these details?

4.

PART A: As it is used in paragraph 9, the word “peevish” most nearly means:

A

Bad-tempered

B

Amused

C

Hopeful

D

Nauseous

5.

PART B: Which word provides the best clue to the answer to Part A?

A

“‘Nonsense!’”

B

“toss of her head”

C

“wrinkled face”

D

“bloom again”

6.

PART A: What does Heidegger mean by “peculiar advantages” in paragraph 19?

7.

PART B: How does this warning contribute to the theme of the story?

8.

What is the most likely reason the author refers to the bust of Hippocrates in paragraph 3?

9.

PART A: Re-read paragraph 41. What does it suggest about the Water of Youth?

A

It does more harm to those who take it than good.

B

The subjects of the experiment may be imagining its effects.

C

Dr. Heidegger already understands its effects and is only administering it because he is cruel and sinister.

D

Its miraculous effects will likely bring Dr. Heidegger great wealth.

10.

PART B: Which quote best supports your answer to the previous question?

A

“Blushing, panting, struggling, chiding, laughing, her warm breath fanning each of their faces by turns, she strove to disengage herself, yet still remained in their triple embrace”

B

“But they were young: their burning passions proved them so”

C

“Yet, by a strange deception, owing to the duskiness of the chamber, and the antique dresses which they still wore, the tall mirror is said to have reflected the figures of the three old, gray, withered grandsires, ridiculously contending for the skinny ugliness of a shrivelled grandam.”

D

“Never was there a livelier picture of youthful rivalship, with bewitching beauty for the prize.”

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers