Leadership of Samuel Gompers from the American Federation of Labor differ from Terence Powderly of the Knights of Labor because Gompers preferred negotiations rather than strikes
For better understanding, let us explain the Leadership of Samuel Gompers
- Samuel Gompers was born 1850 and died in 1924. He was an American labor leader and a Dutch-Jewish cigar maker. He has a doctrine called pure and simple unionism. He only does things that immediately benefited the workers such as wages, hours, and working conditions.
- AFL is known as American Federation of Labor and it was formed in 1886, with Gompers was elected president of a union of skilled workers from one or more trades and uses collective bargaining to reach written agreements on wages hours and working conditions. The AFL used strikes as a major tactic to win higher wages and shorter work weeks.
from the above, we can therefore say the answer Leadership of Samuel Gompers from the American Federation of Labor differ from Terence Powderly of the Knights of Labor because Gompers preferred negotiations rather than strikes is correct
learn more about Samuel Gromper from:
brainly.com/question/23968686
Math: because of probability, data collecting and then the advance type of math for engineering would be my guess.
Answer:
duplication
Explanation:
If we talk about inversion, it inversion, it is a process in which a specific base sequence is inverted or rearranged in such a way that direction is reversed. For example: ABC is changed into BCA, therefore it is not right option.
If we talk about translocation,it is caused by rearrangement of parts between non homologous chromosomes. It can be balanced or unbalanced but it involves two genes or two sets of chromosomes. But in our example, we have only one sequence of DNA under study, therefore, inversion is not possible.
Talking about insertion, it involves addition of one or more nucleotide at certain position of gene sequence. There are chances that it can be an insertion of GGG but the insertion of three G instead of any random nucleotide addition or nucleotide sequence addition is rare. So, there are less chances that this is an insertion and more chances that this is an exact duplication event.
If we talk about duplication, a certain portion of a gene or chromosome is replicated or duplicated in such a way that it results in more than one copies of that region.
Keeping that definition infront, we see that GGG duplicated to GGGGGG. So, if we logically look at the question, duplication seems to be the most appropriate option.
Hope it help!
Hotel: Trivago (I’m bored if you can tell lol)
