answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astra-53 [7]
1 year ago
14

Suppose the production of electricity by a utility generates pollution that harms others. Suppose also that Coase bargainingLOAD

ING...can occur between the utility and the victims of pollution but that the utility has not been legally liable for the damages from its pollution. How would making the utility legally liable for the damages from its pollution affect pollution​ reduction? If the electric utility and the people suffering the effects of the​ utility's pollution can​ bargain, then making the utility legally liable for the damages from its pollution will
A. increase the amount of pollution reduction by decreasing the marginal cost of pollution reduction to the utility.

B. increase the amount of pollution reduction by increasing the marginal cost and increasing the marginal benefit of pollution reduction to the utility.

C. not change the amount of pollution reduction because the marginal benefit and marginal cost of pollution reduction will not change.
Business
1 answer:
vlada-n [284]1 year ago
8 0

Answer:

B. increase the amount of pollution reduction by increasing the marginal cost and increasing the marginal benefit of pollution reduction to the utility.

Explanation:

The above is likely the answer due to the fact that, an increase of the marginal cost would likely lead to increasing the amount of pollution reduction all things being equal.

You might be interested in
Siyed, an economics student, believes that a beer sold by one particular shack on the beach is completely different from an iden
Ghella [55]

Answer:

E) while beer is homogeneous, the product is differentiated among the sellers.

Explanation: The beers are quite identical but each seller differentiates it

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Bob owns a warehouse that is used in business while rebecca owns land. bob exchanges the warehouse for the​ land, which will be
strojnjashka [21]
<span>A. Compute Bob's realized gain (loss) on the exchange. $320,000 + $40,000 + $80,000 = $440,000 - that is selling price $440,000 - $240,000(basis) = $200,000 - that is realized gain B. Compute Bob's taxable recognized gain. $200,000 / $440,000 = 45.45% ($40,000 + $80,000) * 45.45% = $54,544 C. Compute Bob's basis in the land. $(440,000-120,000) / $440,000 = 72.72% $240,000 * 72.72% = $174.545</span>
5 0
1 year ago
On January 1, 2017, Dagwood Company purchased at par 6% bonds having a maturity value of $300,000. They are dated January 1, 201
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

Dagwood bonds receivables   300,000 debit

                             Cash                              300,000 credit

--to record purchase of bonds--

Interest receivables                     18,000 debit

           Interest revenue                               18,000 credit

--to record accrued interest on dagwood bonds--

Cash                                              18,000 debit

         Interest receivables                            18,000 credit

--to record collection of interest--

Explanation:

as the bonds are purchased at par we pay for the same as the face value

interest for the year

principal x rate

300,000 x 6% = 18,000

at December 31th the interest are receivables as we didn't collect the cash yet

Then, on january first, we receive the cash and write-off the receivables

4 0
2 years ago
Superior Micro Products uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data for the Assembly Department for May
JulijaS [17]

Answer

(a) cost per equivalent unit

Item                                Material         Labour      Overheads

Cost per EU($)           84.15         34.25      172.25

b) Total cost per equivalent = $290.65

Explanation:

<em>The weighted average method of valuation of work in progress does not separate opening work-in progress from the newly introduced. </em>

<em>The cost per equivalent units using  this method is computed by dividing the total equivalent units by the cost element. This repeated for each of cost element categories.</em>

Item                                Material         Labour      Overheads

Opening WIP                  36,900          61,650           299,715

Cost added                    <u>223,965</u>          <u>41,100</u>          1<u>99,810</u>

Total cost($)     a             260,865   102,750     499,525

Equivalent unit  b             3,100             3,000            2,900

Cost per EU($) (a/b)         84.15         34.25      172.25

Total cost per equivalent unit =   84.15 + 34.25 + 172.25

Total cost per equivalent=  $290.65

<u />

8 0
1 year ago
Whenever there is an errand to run around lunchtime, Abdul always volunteers. His boss thinks this is because Abdul is a highly
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

Fundamental attribution error.

Explanation:

Fundamental attribution error refers to people's cognitive prejudiced in assuming that the behavior of an individual relies on what kind of person he is instead of on the social and environmental variables that determine that person. It refers to the tendency to describe the conduct of someone based on internal factors, such as personality and to underestimate the impact external factors, such as situational factors, have on actions of the person concerned. As per the question, underestimating the environmental factors to explain Abdul's behavior reflects the fundamental attribution error of his boss.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The combination of all the factors that consumers evaluate when deciding whether or not to buy a good or service is called
    9·1 answer
  • An investigator conducting a study of a medical device under an ide is required to complete and sign
    8·1 answer
  • What did the president mean when he said he had to face “very difficult choices” when creating a federal budget?
    5·2 answers
  • Product X-547 is one of the joint products in a joint manufacturing process. Management is considering whether to sell X-547 at
    13·1 answer
  • At December 1, 2014, Cursive Company's accounts receivable balance was $1,200. During December, Cursive had credit revenues of $
    13·1 answer
  • Drag each event to the correct location on the chart.
    10·1 answer
  • We have the following CAPM E(Ri) = .06 + .08 Beta; a) If Stock X has a beta of 2, what is the required rate of return? b) If we
    9·1 answer
  • mith Manufacturing Company allows employees to purchase materials, such as metal and limber, for personal use at a price equal t
    13·1 answer
  • You have decided to undertake a project and have defined the main research question as "what are the opinions of consumers to a
    13·1 answer
  • During the past year, Arther Anderson Services paid $360,800 in interest along with $48,000 in dividends. The company issued $23
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!