Then everything would be much more simpler
I would say B-correct (By carefully organizing your thoughts) and putting your writing into organizing i know when i have it like that its way more easy for me to understand what your trying explain to the other reader
Literature and the Holocaust have a complicated relationship. This isn't to say, of course, that the pairing isn't a fruitful one—the Holocaust has influenced, if not defined, nearly every Jewish writer since, from Saul Bellow to Jonathan Safran Foer, and many non-Jews besides, like W.G. Sebald and Jorge Semprun. Still, literature qua art—innately concerned with representation and appropriation—seemingly stands opposed to the immutability of the Holocaust and our oversized obligations to its memory. Good literature makes artistic demands, flexes and contorts narratives, resists limpid morality, compromises reality's details. Regarding the Holocaust, this seems unconscionable, even blasphemous. The horrors of Auschwitz and Buchenwald need no artistic amplification.
The correct option is A.
Cloning involves the exact reproduction of a living organism; it is the process of generating a genetically identical copy of an organism. Cloning can be natural or artificial. Natural cloning occur in unicellular organisms which divide into two during asexual reproduction. Artificial cloning involves the use of genes to produce another organism. The genes used comes from a single individual.
