answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
1 year ago
9

HELPPP!! How did members of President Harding's cabinet prove unfit for office?

History
1 answer:
Verizon [17]1 year ago
6 0

Answer:

Due to corruption.

Explanation:

Some members of President Harding's cabinet prove unfit for  office because they were caught by doing corruption. The members of President Harding's cabinet were Albert B. Fall who was the Interior Secretary and Harry Daugherty who was the Attorney General. Both were charged for corruption in office so we can say that the members of President Harding's cabinet prove unfit for  office.

You might be interested in
Write a paragraph describing different forms of colonial rule. be sure to define protectorate, direct rule, and indirect rule an
Katen [24]
<span>A protectorate is a form of colonial rule that allows the region to govern themselves, but still receive protection benefits. Direct rule is in regards to a colonial power having direct control over the laws and legislation of the society in question. Indirect is a more hands-off approach, but still allows the colonial power to have complete control without being physically present.</span>
3 0
2 years ago
In the 1930s, 70% of americans who were polled reported that the ideal number of children to have was _________. in the 1990s, a
Natasha2012 [34]
The answer to the first unknown is "3 or more" while in the second unknown is "no more than two". Hence, we have the complete sentence as in the year 1930's of Americans who were polled reported that the ideal number of children was 3 or more. While in the year 1990's, Americans who were polled reported that the ideal number of children to have is no more than two.
6 0
2 years ago
1. Compare and contrast Spanish, French, Dutch, and British methods of colonization. How were they alike, and how were they diff
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

French, Dutch, and English explorers all began to  make inroads into the Americas during the late 1500's spilling into the early 1600's. The Spanish lost their stronghold in North America as the French, Dutch and British began exploring and then colonizing the North east regions.Spanish colonized the Hispaniola, West Indies, Peru, Caribbean, Mexico regions influenced by  Catholicism with the intent of Conquest, Wealth, Gold. The French colonized the Mississippi, Louisiana, Canada, Great Lake regions, also influenced by Catholicism and with the intent of Trading of fur. The Dutch were influenced by Protestant to colonize the New Amsterdam (New York), colony of New Netherlands with the economic intent to also trade The English colonized  Georgia, Cana, New Mexico, Jamestown, Lymouth, Carolinas, Roakne regions influenced by Protestant with the many economic intents.

Explanation:

This isn't an explanation but i am not too confident with this answer, this is my first AP class and i am still learning, i hope this helps someone, thank you:)

3 0
2 years ago
Which statement best expresses the central idea of the excerpt? Good spies know to destroy evidence in case they are arrested. G
tatuchka [14]

Losing secret papers to the enemy could have serious consequences.

4 0
2 years ago
The type of conformity seen in Sherif’s (1936) study of autokinetic light movement was most likely the result of ________, where
Vinvika [58]

Answer:

private conformity; public conformity

Explanation:

Sherif's study type of comformity is likely the result of  private conformity, while the one in Asch's study was  public conformity. Private conformity is defined mind alteration or change that happens when a person take accepts the position taken by others privately or in seclusion. Public conformity is a superficial in nature, it is a change in the character or behavior  under due observation. it has no corresponding change of opinion and occurs as a result of real/imagined group pressure.  The situation in sherif's study is  very ambiguous while Asch's study is  not ambiguous

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were fifteenth-century Europeans so eager to find a sea route to East Asia? A. They were eager to learn about Asian cultures
    13·1 answer
  • Why do southern states have so many military bases apex?
    15·2 answers
  • When formulating a research question for an informative essay, a writer should write a question that
    7·2 answers
  • According to sinclair, why are the waste barrels not cleaned more often?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST describes the difference between the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security? A. The Department
    7·1 answer
  • 57.As Islam and Christianity spread through Africa, which of the following were examples of their impact? Select all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • think of a time you made a concession in order to avoid a conflict. explain what the conflict was and why you gave in. how would
    11·1 answer
  • Why is Chavez concerned about the growing power of the federal government?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following are true? Select all that apply. There are generally between three to five election officers at each poll
    7·1 answer
  • According to John Maynard Keynes, what was the main cause of the Great Depression?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!