The conclusion that you will be able to reach if method I is used that cannot be concluded if method II is used is that the results can be generalized to the population as a whole.
In method I, the researchers decided to recruit volunteers. This sample includes people who do not exercise, people who exercise alone and people who exercise with a partner. On the other hand, method II will recruit participants at a community fitness center. Therefore, this sample will not include people who do not exercise. This means that method I will have a sample that is more representative of the general population.
Answer:
Candidates will support immigration policies without regard for public opinion due to a lack of quality data.
Explanation:
Good luck with the test :-)
Answer:
- <u><em>All real numbers except c = 0 and c = 3.</em></u>
Explanation:
The equation is:

Since c - 3, c, and c(c - 3) are he denominators, none of them can be equal to zero:
- c (c - 3) ≠ 0 ⇒ c ≠ 0 and c ≠ 3.
Now you can multiply both sides of the equation by the common denominator: c (c - 3):

That means the equality is valid for all real numbers for which it is defined, which is all real numbers except c = 0 and c = 3.