1. Planned action - plot
2. iceberg accident - South Pole
3. first to spot the monster and win the reward - Ned Land
4. separating the whole into its parts - criticism
5. Vigo Bay - "Nemo's 'bank'"
6. run aground "incident" - Straits of Torres
7. does not intrude with comment - self-effacing author
8. not restricted by time, place, or character - omniscient
9. resolving action - denouement
10. narrator of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea - Aronnax
Hope I helped.
(Brainliest would be greatly appreciated!)
<span>It depends on the type of narrator, an unreliable narrator usually opens a story with evidence that the narrator is unreliable by admitting mental illness, making an obviously wrong statement or if the narrator describes himself as a character.</span>
In Ursula Le Guin's "The Wife's Story" readers witness how a pack of wolves kill "the human thing".
From the perspective of a mother, one may understand that it was a necessary thing to do rather than the right one. As we can see in the text itself, the "human thing" was behaving in a very aggressive manner, trying to attack and kill his own children with a branch from a tree. Being left with no other choice, wolves, being predators by nature, protected the cubs and killed the attacker thus depriving him of any chances to repeat his violent actions in future.
As humans, we detest murder as a way of punishment or revenge, but in the given story we deal with wolves, and such behaviour is understandable from their perspective, moreover, one can clearly see that this was done only for protection.
I would say it B because it makes the most sense because he has been doing really well in class and emboldened would mean so that he would have confidence in what he is going to say in Paris
